Flex 3401 VRG HD - First Impressions

T

Trevine

New member
Joined
Jan 21, 2019
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
As some of you may have read in an earlier thread from me, I was trying to decide between a Rupes Mille and the Fex 3401 to compliment my Rupes LHR15 MKII and the Rupes 75. In the end, there we're so many good reviews of the Felx that I went that route.

My primary objective was to speed up the cutting process. Man does the Flex ever deliver in that area and DID NOT disappoint. Sure the Rupes LHR can get the job done, but I just wanted faster corrections. I cannot compare the 3401 to the Mille but here is my take on the comparison vs the Rupes LHR:

Cutting power? Thats a hard one as there are many variables to consider. Each car and paint condition is unique but there is no doubt this thing makes the first correction step MUCH faster. A WIN for sure.

Is the Flex louder? Yes. I would say its mostly coming from the gear drive but definitely louder. However, it's not terrible.

How about that reverse orbit? Well, that was one thing I was muling over but honestly, when I turned the machine on for the first time, it wasn't even noticeable. I was already using it when the thought came into my head and it didn't bother me at all.

Smoothness? Rupes wins in the smoothness category. Again, I attribute this to the gear drive but the flex is not as smooth but not terrible enough to make a difference to me.

"Grabby"? Yes the flex is very grabby but to me, thats its job. It just plain cuts. You definitely need to have both hands on it at all time and pay attention. That said though, you FEEL the power of the machine too.

While I am barely into my first car with the Flex, I think the goto combo given my tools is the Flex for the first correction step then switch to the Rupes (with washer mod :0) for the final polish step. Should be a great combo.

Hope this helps someone in their choices as well.
 
Trevine said:
As some of you may have read in an earlier thread from me, I was trying to decide between a Rupes Mille and the Fex 3401 to compliment my Rupes LHR15 MKII and the Rupes 75. In the end, there we're so many good reviews of the Felx that I went that route.
Click to expand...

Yes I remember that thread and moving into the future, for anyone that would like to check it out, here's the link...

Rupes Mille or Flex 3401



Trevine said:
My primary objective was to speed up the cutting process. Man does the Flex ever deliver in that area and DID NOT disappoint.

That's been my observation for the last 10 years. When I wrote the FLEX how-to book, for every how-to book I've written I try to find a unique way to sign it. When it came to figuring out the FIRST time what to write inside the cover of the book for someone I was signing a book for, here's what simply came naturally to me.


The FLEX 3401 is BEAST!!!

Master the Beast!​


And that's how I've been signing that book ever since and that's how the FLEX company came to officially name the XC 3401 the BEAST.

FLEX_CAT_01.JPG


FLEX_CAT_02.JPG


FLEX_CAT_03.JPG


FLEX_CAT_04.JPG






Trevine said:
Sure the Rupes LHR can get the job done, but I just wanted faster corrections.
Click to expand...

I agree. ANY polisher that can remove paint and thus level the paint surface can do correction work, it's just matter of speed and all those pesky personal preference factors. :)



Trevine said:
I cannot compare the 3401 to the Mille but here is my take on the comparison vs the Rupes LHR:

Cutting power? Thats a hard one as there are many variables to consider. Each car and paint condition is unique but there is no doubt this thing makes the first correction step MUCH faster. A WIN for sure.
Click to expand...


A quote I use from Jason Rose all the time,

Topcoat hardness is an unknown factor

(I never steal other guys stuff and share it like it's my own, I always give due credit where credit is due - I can't say the same for other in the blogosphere)



Trevine said:
Is the Flex louder? Yes. I would say its mostly coming from the gear drive but definitely louder. However, it's not terrible.
Click to expand...

I have never tested/compared or even paid that much attention but you're probably right. Me? I just want to go fast.



Trevine said:
How about that reverse orbit? Well, that was one thing I was muling over but honestly, when I turned the machine on for the first time, it wasn't even noticeable. I was already using it when the thought came into my head and it didn't bother me at all.
Click to expand...

I agree. To ME it's a non-issue. All tools are going to have their own unique characteristics, especially a gear-driven tool be it an orbital or a rotary or even the BuffPro polisher, which is a gear-driven cylinder polisher.



Trevine said:
Smoothness? Rupes wins in the smoothness category. Again, I attribute this to the gear drive but the flex is not as smooth but not terrible enough to make a difference to me.
Click to expand...

Agree.

One thing I would point out or recommend to everyone using a BEAST, as you're working around a panel, RE-INSPECT the pad alignment to the backing plate. When buffing HARD and especially when going up on edge to buff a thin panel, you will cause the pad to shift on the backing plate. No problem, just remove and re-attach. Watch for it too.... you'll hear it and feel it when the pad shifts - so train your yourself to be aware for it. Especially if and when you go up on edge. I teach this in my detailing classes.


Trevine said:
"Grabby"? Yes the flex is very grabby but to me, thats its job. It just plain cuts. You definitely need to have both hands on it at all time and pay attention. That said though, you FEEL the power of the machine too.
Click to expand...

Well said. Any grabbing taking place is the pad and the abrasives GRABBING the paint and removing it fast. :laughing: The tradeoff for smooth and easy is power.


Trevine said:
While I am barely into my first car with the Flex, I think the goto combo given my tools is the Flex for the first correction step then switch to the Rupes (with washer mod :0) for the final polish step. Should be a great combo.

Hope this helps someone in their choices as well.
Click to expand...


I agree.

Starting with the BEAST and finish out with BigFoot - a great tag-team for perfect paint in a time efficient manner.


Thank you so much for sharing your impressions of the FLEX 3401 after your initial use. Over time I'm sure you'll have more feedback to share.


:)
Click to expand...
 
Well said!

I love the 3401 and If I could only have one polisher, it would be the one!
 
Who says white has to be boring. Look at that white shine on this HellCat. This is with my new love...The Flex
 
there's a reason why the 3401 has been around as long as it has. tank build quality, and dependable reliability..
 
I heavily prefer using my 21mm polisher over the 3401. However, I’ve owned every forced rotation polisher out there(including festool) and the 3401 is the only one I still have.


Sent from my iPhone using Autogeekonline mobile app
 
I gueas different people get different results. I have allways found that long throws cut more than forced da. This almost sounds like a troll but each to its own.
 
Joel1979 said:
I gueas different people get different results. I have allways found that long throws cut more than forced da. This almost sounds like a troll but each to its own.
Click to expand...

If I remember correctly you are from Finland? I'm from Sweden. And what I have been wondering about is if there are any difference from the electric motors when they run on 110v or as we have 220v-240v. If we get a higher torque from them or something. Or if 700W is that and no difference if it's on a 110v electric outlets or if you have 700w on a 220v-240v outlet. If we have an advantage of the 220v-240v to get less pad stalling.

Then it's much of the personal preference and how you like to work with the polisher.

But the Beast is without any question a great polisher or it would not be around for so long.
 
Having an opinion on something is not a registered trademark. Two people can have the same opinion on something and both can have arrived at that opinion exclusive of each other.
 
Joel1979 said:
I gueas different people get different results. I have allways found that long throws cut more than forced da. This almost sounds like a troll but each to its own.
Click to expand...

And just because an opinion and preference is different than yours doesn't mean it's a troll.

If reading comprehension escaped you, I do have a long throw and "I" prefer the new Flex for SPEED after just one use compared to my Rupes LHR.
 
I went through the same decision process as you did - Couldn't decide between he flex or the Mille. Ended up following the recommendation of the preponderance of folks here, and bought the Flex. All of the positives everyone extolled are true. The only negative I came up with is I think it is heavy working on vertical panels, but that is compared to the GG6 I started with.

It's impossible for me to say if I'd have been happier with the Mille, but I know I am happy with what I bought.

Hellcat looks great!
 
It is a testament to all the machines mentioned in this thread that we continue to "discuss" our opinions and preferences.

The Flex vs. Rupes has been going on since they came out and the GG6 gets thrown in as well. When opinions are shared on THIS forum I pay attention. With that said, I read opinions however then base a buying purchase on actually using it myself. I have tried and used all machines mentioned and they all have their virtues. I then usually keep my opinion to myself and know I am happy with what works for me.

I never argue for or against personal preferences however totally agree with Trevine's evaluations. I also like and respect Joel's opinion and preference.

Again, a testament to both machines.

Tony brings up a great technical question as well...i.e. does 220 do anything different than 110-120? (I don't think it would as its mains or "user" supplied electricity to operate the machine rated capacity). Being such a wonderfully diverse community here someone can probably answer that.
 
TROLLS come to a thread and down talk the subject in it and try to promote their opinion for reasons that dont contribute to the thread. lol lol lol
 
Yes, and I can almost immediately discount them (silently)!
 
I don't think that Joel think that the OP is a troll. But his own statement could be read as a troll. That's how I read it but I'm not Joel either LOL.
 
I respect your opinion, Wrapt, but I use my 3401 almost exclusively. I finish down with it with very mild abrasives and super fine cut pads. Unlike the OP here, I can one hand a jewelling phase with it nicely.

Then again, I came from the old rotary dayz!
 
I LOVE MY FLEX!!

Cant say anything negative about it to be honest. It gets me out of any correction, there is nothing it hasnt been able to fix.

Need more cutting power, just put a little more weight, and your good to go!

Flex has been going strong and i have no need for another polisher to be honest. I have the flex light rotary and the flex kompact, both also good machines.

If your shopping around and the flex is one of your choices, you wont go wrong choosing the flex, trust me.


Sent from my iPhone using AGOnline
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top