WRAPT C5Z06
New member
- Nov 12, 2009
- 12,615
- 0
lol I love how all of you are saying the Flex is BY FAR better, when it's not better. In SOME WAYS it's better, but for raw correction ability, the Griot's is the more powerful of the two. The forced rotation from the Flex offers a better initial finish, but it leaves a lot of defects behind that the Griot's removes.
VR8 and I work together and he uses the Flex and I use the new Griot's. My machine is more powerful and I get better defect removal, but his machine is more refined and leaves less marring.
I've had no real quality issues with my Griot's other than the C-clip holding the bearing assembly together wearing out, but that's after a good 60 cars or so and daily use at maximum speeds. I love it's power and correction ability, but I also love the Flex for it's ability to leave a cleaner finish with certain pad/product combinations.
Now, let me be clear, that's not to say the Griot's doesn't leave the same finish as the flex, as it does and does not require any extra passes or time that the flex doesn't. But both John (VR8) and I have noticed that the flex can leave a cleaner finish in some instances where the power of the Griot's can sometimes require a bit more "dialing-in" in terms of pad/product combination. Sometimes it's just too aggressive where the forced rotation of the flex allows a cleaner, more reliable correction with more predictable results and particular pad/product combinations.
The lifetime warranty of the Griot's is bulletproof. I tried to get a new C-clip to repair my old machine, but instead, they sent me a whole new machine, no questions asked. Have no fear that the warranty is "questionable". As it's not.
Hope I helped. Long story short, for more correction ability, go with the Griot's, but if you're looking for a more predictable finish with less "dialing-in" and your budget can handle the cost, go with the Flex.
I'm surprised the Griot's can possibly remove more defects than the 3401? What are others opinions on this?
Last edited: