Thank you, Kristopher, for posting my thoughts exactly. I've given it a fair number of tries by now and just don't feel the cut is there. I've tried it via rotary with both wool and a burgundy cutting foam, and also with my Dynabrade, also with a W8000 pad.
In fact, today I was doing some experimental work on my trunk. After not getting enough cut (and lacking anything else with power) I reached for my old standby (AutoGlym 02B) and got better results. This is in spite of the fact that 02B is aligned closer to 205 in level of cut.
I feel the same way. I just don't see it. I do think it's a decent product. But I don't feel it deserves the respect it seems to get on most threads and forums. I really don't see why this is so many peoples "go to" compound.
As a deep cutting compound (which it is supposed to be)...I don't find it to be that great. I have tried it so many times. I've gone through a whole 32 oz. bottle trying numerous methods, pads, and the addition of other sources like water, 205, and pad lubricant to the mix trying to make this stuff work the way I'd like it to. Can't get it to work efficiently.
Now, don't get me wrong. The product does have it's advantages. I've gotten it to work in quite a few instances. As for the relationship between 105 and 205...I think they go well together. I find that whatever swirls are left by 105, are easily removed by 205 either by rotary, or DA.
Also, when it comes to minor surface defects such as water spots, oxidation, or minor scuffs and scratches...105 via the LC 5.5 orange pad, and the PC is a piece of cake to work with. I usually just use a little bit of water, or prime my pad with 205...and BOOM, those minor mishaps are gone. Then followed by 205 with the LC white pad...golden results.
But, I have compounds at my disposal that do that with less effort using a rotary. I know that 105 is advertised as being able to be used with a rotary...which I don't understand. I feel the rotary is a world 105 should never see. Granted, it does work well with a foam pad with the addition of another source such as water, lubricant, or 205.
But if you lay down some lines of 105, then pick up the beads using a wool pad at the RPMs they recommend....gooooood luck! You will find yourself rushing, trying to compete with the spread time of this product which is very minimal (at the recommended RPM). Then IMO, be left with less than sufficient results.
In comparison to other compounds that I've had numerous hands on experience with...it falls short IMO.
I'm not trying to create argument, or cause a pissing contest between detailers. This is just my opinion. I definitely know that a LOT of people are going to disagree with me. I'm fine with that...as long as it is understood that this is MY opinion. It may mean nothing to you, and you may think I'm an idiot. I'm honestly ok with that critique. I just ask you respect my opinion. :cheers: