Eldorado2k
Well-known member
- Nov 9, 2015
- 14,545
- 645
So you don't like ANY of the new Caddy's?
Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk
I think the new CT6 looks amazing. CTS V and ATS V look good although personally I'm not a big fan of it being more like a race car than a comfortable luxury car. And with the CTS V costing upwards of $84,000 I don't think that's gonna happen. Ever lol.
They've got the ATS and XTS sedans, and they practically look the same..
I think the SRX looks horrible, and I've never been a fan of the Escalade. I feel like they sold out and gave their loyal customers something they never asked for when they introduced that truck and called it a Cadillac.
They got rid of the Eldorado in 2002 after almost 50 years of it being Cadillacs flagship vehicle.. A handful years later they did away with its sister car the Seville. And after 50 years of what a Cadillac should always be, they got rid of the Deville. They got rid of the XLR, which was a great looking car, another bad move IMO.. Not to mention the Fleetwood Brougham back in 1996. All great vehicles that trully embodied what a Cadillac has always been and should be.
Now they've replaced them all with cars that don't even have a name or any real distinctive appearance to them. When I think of the new ones the same boring silver colored car comes to mind. They all look the same. XTS, ATS, CTS, CT6,SRX, ELR... What the heck kind of names are those? Lol. They can't even think of a name these days? It's sad that the only 1 that has an actual name is a truck.
I try to continue liking Cadillac as that's where my heart has been my whole life, but I feel like they sold us out to keep up with the joneses. Meanwhile they don't have the guts to release their true capabilities such as the Elmiraj and Ciel concept cars. Those are the vehicles they Should be selling. Vehicles with true distinction like back in the days. It's no surprise those cars have actual names as well.
Sorry for the long post but I couldn't help it. I'm done ranting. Lol.