3M 08963 Do-It Yourself Fuel System Tune Up Kit

MPG Update 6/14/2011:

Just to update the thread and track any lasting effects from the cleaning I thought I would post an update. The car was again filled with 87 octane from the same Exxon I get fuel at almost every week. I made a few trips in the car that I do no regularly make, and it was 101 degrees here two days last week. With those variables I checked the MPG today and the results:

27.85MPG! Down from the last 29.1MPG but better than the the pre cleaning MPG!
 
if its been quite a long time since cleaning the fuel system and all that i wouldn't doubt it... having the injectors spray a finer mist and atomize the fuel better on every single intake stroke will definately increase the power per stroke and increase the fuel economy by restoring power. not to mention the effects of cleaning the spark plugs to get a much better spark. i am always sure to clean my fuel system once a year and people who have the exact same car and setup as me get nearly 10 mpg less than i do when driving on the interstate.

How the hell are they getting less than 10mpg than you, if you are talking about the MKIV?

I have never seen anyone post above the 30mpg mark with a stock MKIV TT
 
@xlntshine: go over to - Bob is the Oil Guy where they have a forum, including a retired Pennzoil oil technician and tell them as a whole that pennzoil has bees wax. I'll bring a chair and popcorn.
 
@xlntshine: go over to - Bob is the Oil Guy where they have a forum, including a retired Pennzoil oil technician and tell them as a whole that pennzoil has bees wax. I'll bring a chair and popcorn.
THISGONBGUD.gif

BITOG is gold mine of info I love it.
 
@xlntshine: go over to - Bob is the Oil Guy where they have a forum, including a retired Pennzoil oil technician and tell them as a whole that pennzoil has bees wax. I'll bring a chair and popcorn.

Consulted my ASLE handbook and looks like I misunderstood the meaning of being a paraffin based oil stock. Still a regular petro. oil is refined from a paraffinic crude which contains wax's or wax like substances. These are refined out to what ever spec that the manufacturer desires from what info I could get my hands on.

For proof of the origin of the base oils see this link:

Resolving Anticompetitive Concerns, FTC Clears Shell Oil's $1.8 Billion Acquisition of Pennzoil-Quaker State

"
Group II base oil is one of three types of paraffinic base oils produced in the United States and Canada. Paraffinic base oil is used to produce motor oil and other lubricants, and is needed to meet current performance standards for lighter-viscosity motor oil formulations, such as 5-W20 and 5-W30, as well as requirements for other lubricants.
"As new performance standards are adopted, there will be an even greater demand for Group II base oil in the production of motor oil and other lubricants," said Joe Simons, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition. "Without the conditions of this order, direct competition between Shell and Pennzoil in the production of Group II base oils would be eliminated, with the significant potential for reduced competition and higher prices for consumers."

Also you can look this up for yourself and see what I am talking about. Find the case of Mobile Vs. Castrol Syntec where Mobile claims that a standard base stock is not a synthetic oil. The court ruled in favor of Castrol though.. I feel that it was a judges decision and not science.

Top grade oils use a Group IV base stock and those are usually classified as fully synthetic oils. Check out the wikipedia page it has some good info..

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If I could edit my statement about beeswax I would... it was incorrect. I took a distributors word that the addition of beeswax was to add the distinct color to Pennzoil and Quaker-state. I can not find public information that would prove this to be true or anything saying that is could not be true. I will assume it is not true until I find information otherwise.

I do invite anyone to get samples of oils.. Exxon, Mobil, Shell, Valvoline, Pennzoil, Quaker State, Castrol, Amsoil, Wolfs-head and poor them in glass containers. You can visually see that the Pennzoil and Quaker State is darker in color and lacks clarity.

I think further proof of the the benefits of synthetic can been seen if you take these samples and drop the temperatures to below freezing and look at the viscosity change and the cloudy nature of a Hydro-cracked Paraffinic oil compared to a PAO based oil.

I would also like to conclude that I have no interest in proving myself to those guys on BITOG!!

I challenge anyone to run Pennzoil, Valvoline, and ANY synthetic in identical engine with identical conditions and the Pennzoil will prove to be a dirty oil.

I don't have a card in this game unlike BOB or who ever the Pennzoil retired member is. It is like anything else when you work their how could you not have a bias. I read what those guys are saying and I don't think ANY of them are chemical engineers (nor am I) or let alone have lubrication engineering books and handbooks for casual reading on the coffee table like myself.
 
I would also like to include the fact that the oils being used by any professional race team are NOT the stuff you buy off the shelf at the local parts store. We don't even use the parts store oils in the equipment here at work. We use Castrol Industrial lubricants in all of our stationary and mobile equipment. It is a very diffrent product! Don't fall for the hype!
 
Further... I encourage you to add water to a sample of a paraffinic based oil and mix the product to make an emulsion. Do the same with a PAO oil and you will see that the PAO will not create a true emulsion. Add heat to each sample and attempt to remove the water.. you will get two very diffrent results.
 
Back
Top