Finally decided to use diminishing abrasive polishes more often...

[ScottB]

Menzerna has some of the best finishing products offered, and you know their technology use Diminishing Abrasives.

 

[goodinblack]

Do the products actually state on the label which type they are?

 

[Mike@DedicatedPerfection]

Do the products actually state on the label which type they are?

No.

 

[Lim3]

Random question.
Is there an article so I can read more on wash type of polish ?
Want to learn more of each

 

[Evan.J]

http://www.autogeekonline.net/forum/hot-topics-frequently-asked-questions/23561-smat-pack-everything-you-ever-wanted-know-about-meguiar-s-smat-products.html

Random question.
Is there an article so I can read more on wash type of polish ?
Want to learn more of each

There you go

 

[Lim3]

http://www.autogeekonline.net/forum...anted-know-about-meguiar-s-smat-products.html
There you go

Thank you sir

 

[WRAPT C5Z06]

I was doing some more research before I pulled the trigger on FG400. I came across a direct comparison between M105 and FG400. The testing was done by Todd Helme of Autopia-carcare. The review/testing was EXCELLENT!!!! I HIGHLY respect Todd's opinion.

The testing was done with a rotary and DA polisher. The results were completely opposite of what I expected. FG400 slightly out cut M105(except with MF pads), while M105 finished slighty better(except with a finishing pad) than FG400!!! In 4 of the 5 tests, M105 finished better than FG400. So, as far as FINISHING ability for the most part in this test, SMAT > DAT.

I'm no longer going to buy FG400. Not saying FG400 is bad, I just prefer a better finish, even if there's a bit less cut. Plus, I like to use MF pads and FG400 didn't fare so well with them.