Gloss Meter
- Thread starter Ronin47
- Start date
Mike Phillips
Active member
- Dec 5, 2022
- 51,004
- 7
I think I remember Meguiar's had one and got rid of it.
The reason why is the a machine cannot take in all the elements of appearance that the human eyes can perceive.
Just sayin....
But for sure a cool marketing tool.
The reason why is the a machine cannot take in all the elements of appearance that the human eyes can perceive.
Just sayin....
But for sure a cool marketing tool.
TheSteelFoX
New member
- May 29, 2016
- 9
- 0
I work in a paint lab, every batch is tested for gloss and although we have multiple gloss readers, we only read on 60 degree.
PaulMys
Active member
- Jan 14, 2014
- 10,772
- 3
I think I remember Meguiar's had one and got rid of it.
The reason why is the a machine cannot take in all the elements of appearance that the human eyes can perceive.
Just sayin....
But for sure a cool marketing tool.
Funny, when I read the OP, I thought "My gloss meter is my eye". Lol
Not disparaging the OP's post in any way.........
LSNAutoDetailing
Active member
- Jun 21, 2014
- 3,373
- 21
Larry C has a 60degree Elcometer and has a video on it. Wow spending $2k to say "that's shiny."
Loach
New member
- May 24, 2014
- 452
- 0
I've got one that measures at all three angles but the majority of my readings are on the 20° setting, I haven't tested much with the other angles. 20° is more suited for higher gloss surfaces, and 85° more for low gloss surfaces. 60° is a good all around angle and most of the gloss meters that are within a reasonable budget are measuring at 60°.
- Thread starter
- #8
So 60 is fine for car paint yeah?
BudgetPlan1
Well-known member
- Dec 21, 2015
- 2,141
- 209
Way outta my league/budget but sure would be fun to have.
Appearance is such a subjective thing, especially when using a new product that 'appears' to add a new visual dimension to the surface.
Larry C has a 60degree Elcometer and has a video on it. Wow spending $2k to say "that's shiny."
Well, some people spend that much chasing the newest wax/sealant/coating trying to find the 'shiniest' one on the planet. I'd never buy one but I could see it being useful for a manufacturer or detailer trying to provide objective claims.
Loach
New member
- May 24, 2014
- 452
- 0
Yes, 60° will be fine. One of the differences between measuring at the 20° and 60° angle, is the 20° is more sensitive if there's any haze in the paint.
Gloss-Meters.com has a good explanation and picture:
"The acute measurement angle of 20° gives improved resolution for high gloss surfaces. Surfaces that measure 70 GU and above at the standard angle of 60° are often measured with this geometry. The 20° angle is more sensitive to haze effects that affect the appearance of a surface. The different gloss of these two samples is more clearly shown in the 20° readings."
So you can see the reduction in gloss readings when going from a lower haze to a higher haze surface is going to be less sensitive with the 60° (loss of 1.7GU) compared to the 20° (loss of 8.1GU). Another thing you can see from the picture is you're not necessarily going to get the same readings depending on which angle you're measuring at. At the higher gloss range I'm not seeing such a large difference. I went out just now and the test panel measures at the 105.3°GU range at 20° and 102.5GU at 60° and 103.2GU at 85°.
Larry C has a 60degree Elcometer and has a video on it. Wow spending $2k to say "that's shiny."
Exactly, that's the problem with these glossmeters. If I would have bought my Rhopoint new I would have spent $2,800. The information I'm getting out of the meter is not worth anywhere near that dollar amount. It's an accurate product, the repeatability is fantastic and it will absolutely detect different products on top of the paint. But gloss by itself is a very limited statistic, the meters that measure beyond gloss like distinctness of image, haze, image quality, these are the more relevant subjects to determining paint quality but they're just not affordable.
Peak gloss of most LSP's is not found until it has been washed. Any oils or residuals left behind by the LSP on the surface can (and most likely will) negatively impact the measurements coming out of the gloss meter.
Calendyr
New member
- Jun 9, 2013
- 3,996
- 0
Ordered one yesterday, should get it sometimes this week. Here in Canada, 200$ off Amazon.ca, same one was available on E-Bay for 145$ but it was from China... so I decided to pay the extra 55$ and not risk a defective unit or a package that never reaches me for some reason (like the vendor not sending it maybe).
The unit I got is the same one that Forensic Details uses for his videos.
So I think this will be very good to make promotional videos, I will be able to put numbers to the paint gloss improvement for each type of prep/finishes that I offer. Also it will help me evaluate techniques and products better. I see no downsides to this purchase.
The unit I got is the same one that Forensic Details uses for his videos.
So I think this will be very good to make promotional videos, I will be able to put numbers to the paint gloss improvement for each type of prep/finishes that I offer. Also it will help me evaluate techniques and products better. I see no downsides to this purchase.
- Thread starter
- #13
Which model are you getting?
Calendyr
New member
- Jun 9, 2013
- 3,996
- 0
- Thread starter
- #15
Thanks, ordered it too.
rlmccarty2000
New member
- Dec 23, 2013
- 2,002
- 0
Looks like a fun tool to play with. I hope to see some product reviews with the gloss readings attached. I don’t know if Gloss readings on wax products would change my mind, but gloss readings on coatings sure would help (maybe). I suppose you will have to do two measurements, one before the coating and one after the coating has cured. Since coatings don’t fully cure for 14 days or more it would be nice to do a day by day comparison of gloss levels. There have been many reports of products like Polish Angel High Gloss looking glossier the next day after application, a Gloss meter could verify these anecdotal recounts.
- Thread starter
- #17
Yeah to compare compounds, AIO’s, finishing polishes, waxes, sealants, coatings and pads/combo’s is a must but also adjusting technique-machine speed,arm speed, pressure etc etc.
Calendyr
New member
- Jun 9, 2013
- 3,996
- 0
For me, I plan to use it on the client's vehicle during the inspection phase. Then I would take a reading after LSP has been applied. I think it's nice info for before/after documentation of the jobs.
I need to edit my inspection sheets to include gloss level and paint thickness. Right now I write the numbers for paint thickness on the car sections using Mike's Inspection sheet car graphic.
It will be interesting to see the difference in gloss between something like D151, D166, PowerLock, Reload and a coating. To my eye, Reload has always given the most gloss when it comes to LSP. But I think the difference is minimal, since gloss is mostly due to paint condition. On that note, most gloss I have seen from polishes was from Essence, I am really eager to see the numbers. I think I will be like a kid at christmas with this tool
I need to edit my inspection sheets to include gloss level and paint thickness. Right now I write the numbers for paint thickness on the car sections using Mike's Inspection sheet car graphic.
It will be interesting to see the difference in gloss between something like D151, D166, PowerLock, Reload and a coating. To my eye, Reload has always given the most gloss when it comes to LSP. But I think the difference is minimal, since gloss is mostly due to paint condition. On that note, most gloss I have seen from polishes was from Essence, I am really eager to see the numbers. I think I will be like a kid at christmas with this tool
DaveT435
Active member
- Jun 23, 2012
- 3,982
- 0
I sent in an inquiry about one I was looking at. They said I would be better off going with one that measured all three angles, especially with metallic paint. There are some fairly reasonable ones that measure all three.
I could guarantee that gloss meter result is pretty ligit. Most of car care products manufacturing hate it because it could proved that the claimed of their wax, sealant and coating making car glossier a false claim. The glossiest paint is when it had been polished and wipe down, any coating, wax, sealant will not as gloss as bare paint as they will make reflection of light to be distorted. Anyway, wax and sealant have some substance that distort the light and having dimensional look benefit that make the car look fantastic by the eyes, just that it's not glossiest.