Horsepower War is in full effect

-440...built...

-Now I had a 1970 440 Plymouth GTX---completely stock.

-Speaking of heavy:
With three other, over 200lbs passengers:
Drove the 76 mile portion of the BG Parkway (Lexington to Bowling Green) in 34 minutes on stock tires.

-Sold it after one year of ownership.
Wish I still had it...they fetch a pretty penny nowadays.

:)

Bob

Not bad at all, even stock they were something back then.

Yeah I know they do... NOW... LOL

I try not to think about it too much. :D
 
Add the new ZO6 to the mix now!

Sent from my SPH-M930 using AG Online
 
Yeah its a 6.2L blown engine, called the LT4 (once again, no originality with engine code). My buddy was at the NAIAS (before its opened) and sent me a pic of the plaque for the car, also the C7R also, looks to have a longer wheelbase, maybe it was just the pic.
 
That 8 speed auto will go like stink!
^^^^^^^^^^^^
yes.gif
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

{You Canadians and your local-Colloquialisms.}


..............


:)

Bob
 
Nice cars, I would take the mustang any day of the week
 
That was an awesome video! I thought the streets looked familiar then I saw the end of the video, THE D! Love what they did to that Mustang, especially the tails!!

Sent from my SPH-M930 using AG Online

I liked the video too. You would think it's a tweaked Mustang, but it is a new car from a small company based in Rochester Hills, Mich.

According to the article I read the company "began working on the Bass770 six years ago. Its aim was to create the ultimate dream car; one that's undeniably unique and unequivocally American. Equus, created its frame from scratch out of superformed aluminum lined with carbon-fiber inner panels. This helps the Bass770 tip the scales at just 3,640 lbs. — 480 lbs. lighter than a Camaro ZL1.

Ditching the '60s muscle car stigma of atrocious brakes, Equus opts for carbon ceramic matrix rotors by Brembo. GM's magnetic ride suspension comes equipped, too, promising a driving experience as smooth as Frank Sinatra. The engine, a 6.2-liter supercharged V-8 featuring 640 hp and 605 lb.-ft. of torque, is the LS9 from a Corvette ZR1, capable of dashing to 60 mph in 3.4 seconds and reaching a top speed of 200 mph, while routing said performance to the rear wheels via a six-speed, dual clutch manual transmission."
 
Before I moved to Chicagoland a little over 4 yrs ago I lived in Rochester Hills, not far from wherever this place is. I wonder if they caught any hell from FoMoCo on this car? The name name me thing about Hyundai's flagship, wonder how they skated around that? Either way, the car is stunning!

Sent from my SPH-M930 using AG Online
 
Rumors are around about the new barracuda that will be branded a SRT like the viper is. Supposedly it's supposed to be a whole new platform RWD shard with some fiat. It will be more mustang like. That being said I have a mustang, but would love a challenger for everyday. I think it's the coolest looking of all of the modern muscle cars and has enough interior room to be useful.
 
Myself I love the look of the chargers. I'm a mopar guy so any of the mopar muscle make me drool. I would be interested in that cuda. I have a dart that is based on a fiat chassis and we love it.
 
They need to do an SRT version of the Dart, make something affordable for a change!

Sent from my SPH-M930 using AG Online
 
We have a Charger R/T in the family and as far as new cars go it has to be one of the best bang for the buck cars you can buy. Under 30 grand for a close to 400 hp Hemi with cylinder cut off for decent mileage and it's a relatively roomy car. Would I rather have a charger 2 door hardtop, absolutely. I guess it just needs to be accepted that most of the public wants 4 doors.
 
We have a Charger R/T in the family and as far as new cars go it has to be one of the best bang for the buck cars you can buy. Under 30 grand for a close to 400 hp Hemi with cylinder cut off for decent mileage and it's a relatively roomy car. Would I rather have a charger 2 door hardtop, absolutely. I guess it just needs to be accepted that most of the public wants 4 doors.

The 4 door Sedan is the most popular segment in the US. Makes a lot of sense. That's what I prefer for a DD. Even without kids, it's useful for hauling friends and family and just in General gives a lot more room for other things. I don't particularly care for hatchbacks but that's a growing segment for the same reason- roomy but can still be sporty and fun.
 
There better be some fat 305mm+ rear tires on these cars. 600+ hp is pretty useless on a rwd car unless the torque is balanced.

But you should try 600+ HP in a FWD car! :D Makes a RWD a walk in the park.
(Just messing with ya'.....) :laughing:

Its not the size of the tire, its what the tire is made of. TC isn't the ticket here, its not made for when you add power to your car, its for when the weather goes south.

The horsepower wars of today eclipse "the good old days", todays cars are so much more rounded and yeah the old cars sounded great but it doesn't take much to get any car to sound good, even todays modern muscle cars sound good stock, not all of them but have you heard the newer 5.0 Mustangs!!!

Sent from my SPH-M930 using AG Online

I'll agree that the size AND the compound make it work.
But TC isn't just for bad weather. On some vehicles is downright diabolical! Now my lil' Red G isn't but 300HP but I was warned before buying it not to get crazy when the tires wear out at 15K and try to put some 40,000 mile tires on it. The service manager told me he had at least 1 car a week come in saying something was wrong with their car, it wouldn't run right, the engine keeps cutting out, blah blah blah.

He'd go look at the car and it'd have brand new tires on it. He asked them about replacing the tires and they said the needed something that lasted longer. Then he would replace them with RE050's, (per manufacturer spec) have them drive the car again, and presto everything worked fine!

I replaced my rears with another set of RE050's at 15K, then all four at 28K. I went with Michelin Pilot Sports and I freaking HATE THEM!

I drive mine with VDC off all the time, BECAUSE it's so freaking aggressive.
Yet my new tires break loose much worse than the OEM ones did. Great for laying drags, not so great for traction when you want it! :dunno:

Thing is... They are just barely harder than the Bridgestone's but the sidewalls are much MUCH softer. They ride a lot better, they are a lot smoother, and noticeably quieter (especially on the expressway). My wife L-O-V-E-S them!!!!!
But the sidewall flex, (especially in the twisties) drives me freaking nuts! You can be on a long sweeper, (that has them flexed all the way to one side) hit an expansion bump and feel the tires chirp back to center then flex back to the side again. :rolleyes:

Couldn't agree more about todays pony cars versus the ones of yesteryear. Those cars drove like tanks! They were rattle traps, rusted, handled like crap, didn't stop for $hit, but made a lot of smoke when you pushed the "go pedal". Why? Because of bias ply tires! I had a bunch of them, but the worst one (as far as trying to control it's power to the ground) was a 425HP Javelin with 70 series tires on it! Stupidest thing you've ever seen on a car. You could be going 45, slap it in second, (automatic with a slap stick and a Dana 60 positrack in the rear) and it'd light the rear end up for as long as you kept your foot in it. You could FORGET about a standing start! Oh noooooooo...... that puppy would just sit there and smoke, like you could get out and walk around it while the tires just melted down, get back in, fasten your belts, adjust your mirrors, hit second gear, plug in the 8-track, fast forward, wait for it to keep smoking the tires, and eventually you'd gone about 60'. :laughing:

Old MOPAR's, had them too. Buddies in high school had them, my girlfriend (now wife) raced them. Rattle traps! Classic 67 GTO you say? She drove one! We couldn't wait to get rid of it for a Camaro for her Senior graduation gift! ;) Fords? I had TWO! One a 2 bolt main 302, the other a 4 bolt main that'd run low 12's on street tires all day. Racing slicks and light weight skinny front tires on it and it'd pull the front wheels off the ground. All of 5.5mpg and a rock crusher 4 speed with a 4.10 gear all day and all night.

I'll take my little red G with a V6 and run those old cars through the turns any day of the week. (BTW mine has 4WS and the sport handling package so it does tend to like turning.) ;)

Doesn't mean massive muscle isn't good for 1/8th mile though. :) Watch those idiots on the street racing show? While most of the racing is a farce, one can't argue the cars are F_A_S_T!!!!!! Loved the little bug that AZN has now that smoked the Lambo and the GTR with. But remember, it was only an 1/8th mile though. Left up to me and I'd throw all those clowns UNDER the jail. Besides, who needs 2000 horsepower for a "street" wink-wink car? :rolleyes:
 
Cardaddy, what's your DD again? Also, good stories there too!

Sent from my SPH-M930 using AG Online
 
I really don't want or need more than I've currently got in my 6.1L Challenger. 425/420 is more than enough for a street car, I break loose as is. If it went any faster, I'd end up breaking them loose way too often.

Now, the 6.4 Hemi with the MDS cylinder shutoff for mileage, I'd take that extra 50 HP and Torque and live with it.
 
Back
Top