Anthony Orosco
New member
- Dec 17, 2006
- 356
- 0
Hey guys,
I once had a soap sent to me some years back to test out for a company. I used it and while it cleaned and performed well it had hardly any suds to it so I checked in with the manufacturer and told them my findings and concerns. The chemist replied back to me that bubbles and suds is a misconception to cleaning and done more for public "peace of mind" but that it's the surfactants in the soap that is the cleaning and emulsifying agent, not suds, foam or bubbles.
If you used a soap which didn't suds up many may think, "Hey, this soap sucks....it doesn't even have any suds...how can it clean?!" Well I carry a hand soap that doesn't suds up but cleans very effectively and as already noted there are several "No Rinse" type products that clean very well but do not suds up...or at least very little. So a car shampoo can clean very well, have great lubrication and yet not have large amounts of suds.
Suds though are cool and it is thought that the foam acts as a cushion or lubrication of sorts and there may be some truth to that but as I am told suds are more of a by-product from the main ingredients which do the actual work of cleaning.
I'm not against the foam gun but having used one I don't see any advantage to using one and to me it seems to waste more soap. I also grasp that people claim it emulsifies the dirt so it makes for easy cleaning and less chance of marring but here again I pre-soak a car with water which (because water is a solvent) starts the emulsifying process. I then wash the car and I have to say that I get next to zero marring on cars when washed carefully without the use of a foam gun.
For an enthusiast the foam gun I'm sure is cool but for a pro I only see it as time consuming. This though is only my personal opinion.
Anthony
I once had a soap sent to me some years back to test out for a company. I used it and while it cleaned and performed well it had hardly any suds to it so I checked in with the manufacturer and told them my findings and concerns. The chemist replied back to me that bubbles and suds is a misconception to cleaning and done more for public "peace of mind" but that it's the surfactants in the soap that is the cleaning and emulsifying agent, not suds, foam or bubbles.
If you used a soap which didn't suds up many may think, "Hey, this soap sucks....it doesn't even have any suds...how can it clean?!" Well I carry a hand soap that doesn't suds up but cleans very effectively and as already noted there are several "No Rinse" type products that clean very well but do not suds up...or at least very little. So a car shampoo can clean very well, have great lubrication and yet not have large amounts of suds.
Suds though are cool and it is thought that the foam acts as a cushion or lubrication of sorts and there may be some truth to that but as I am told suds are more of a by-product from the main ingredients which do the actual work of cleaning.
I'm not against the foam gun but having used one I don't see any advantage to using one and to me it seems to waste more soap. I also grasp that people claim it emulsifies the dirt so it makes for easy cleaning and less chance of marring but here again I pre-soak a car with water which (because water is a solvent) starts the emulsifying process. I then wash the car and I have to say that I get next to zero marring on cars when washed carefully without the use of a foam gun.
For an enthusiast the foam gun I'm sure is cool but for a pro I only see it as time consuming. This though is only my personal opinion.
Anthony