Setec Astronomy
Well-known member
- Aug 31, 2010
- 17,056
- 1,348
To avoid any confusion, I have an easier analgy. If you have a brand new cutting pad, and you use it on a vehicle, and then wash it. It may be clean but the pressure, heat and chemicals have broken down the foam to a point. After you use it again, it does not have the same cut as brand new and goes from a cutting pad to a polishing pad. With the 1 pad system, you always get consistant results.
This really opens a huge can of worms here in the "detailing as a science" and "fighting with people on the internet" world. How many product reviews and opinions did we just nullify with the revelation that a pad is not a pad? Do we now have to state when we review a compound/polish how many uses we have on the pad in order to qualify the cutting capability remaining in the pad at the time we tested, and therefore what portion of the cutting came from the pad and what from the chemical?
So, instead of "I just tried XYZ compound on an LC orange CCS" it will be "...on an LC orange CCS with 2 uses" or "...6.8 minutes on speed 5.5". I just used my Hydro-Tech pads a couple of months ago and got great results...will I not be as thrilled with them next time? Did it make a difference that I cleaned the pad between panels with my Edge toothbrush (i.e., did brushing the pad "wear it out" so I really only was using a new pad for the first panel)?