RaskyR1
New member
- Apr 14, 2008
- 3,733
- 0
I don't think any of the testers have argued whether or not the Surbuf/M105 combo cuts better, or that a follow up step the the D300 compound is needed, after all, it is a 2 step system.
Consistent in all reviews is that the D300 finishes down better than the Surbuf/M105, dusting is FAR less, better working time, and wipe off is a breeze.
I've also found the cleaning of the Surbuf's pads is best done with compressed air, so there really is no added time for me using the MF pads.
The MF pads are more durable, hands down!
This system does not replace a rotary, period. It does however allow users (both novice and pro) to get rotary like results without the increased risk of damaging the paint or leaving holograms. This is simply another great tool for a detailer to have in there arsenal.
Spicy I'm well aware of who you observed the testing with, and we both know that he's a little anti DA. I also noticed one of the paints he used it on was also Jet Black, which I believe at least one of the other testers has said he couldn't get it to finish down well on. Of the cars I worked on only two would not finish down without micro marring.
I understand people being a little cynical about this system, but do you really think I or any of the other detailers who tested it would put there reputation on the line to hype a product for something it's not?
Just my $.02
Rasky
Consistent in all reviews is that the D300 finishes down better than the Surbuf/M105, dusting is FAR less, better working time, and wipe off is a breeze.
I've also found the cleaning of the Surbuf's pads is best done with compressed air, so there really is no added time for me using the MF pads.
The MF pads are more durable, hands down!
This system does not replace a rotary, period. It does however allow users (both novice and pro) to get rotary like results without the increased risk of damaging the paint or leaving holograms. This is simply another great tool for a detailer to have in there arsenal.
Spicy I'm well aware of who you observed the testing with, and we both know that he's a little anti DA. I also noticed one of the paints he used it on was also Jet Black, which I believe at least one of the other testers has said he couldn't get it to finish down well on. Of the cars I worked on only two would not finish down without micro marring.
I understand people being a little cynical about this system, but do you really think I or any of the other detailers who tested it would put there reputation on the line to hype a product for something it's not?
Just my $.02
Rasky