Jeremy1976
New member
- Apr 13, 2015
- 978
- 0
- Thread starter
- #41
It was a pre release kit. Will be sold starting March 2017.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was a pre release kit. Will be sold starting March 2017.
It was a pre release kit. Will be sold starting March 2017.
The coating applied was the Garry Dean Infinite Force Field kit.
So going back to the thread title "Reason I won't use a coating again" is the result of an unreleased product with little to no information available.... that just doesn't seem fair to the rest of the coatings out there that have had years and years of testing by both pros and consumers.
Again, not saying that any coating will prevent iron deposits, but it is a little unusual to write off coatings in general when the only data you've gathered comes from a (relatively) unknown product.
If you've got another vehicle, perhaps you could pick up a more popular option and do some comparisons (if you haven't noticed... people around here like head-to-head product battles. 2 will enter, one will remain. Fight to the death. That sort of thing)?
Going to have to agree with Zach on everything he posted in this thread. I am curious as well as why this coating was chosen over a tried and true coating. Perhaps the one that was used is a beta version.
Either way, use an iron remover and wash it.
Impulse buy thats why. Looked easy to apply, price seemed fair. I will try something different to compare.
How can you impulse buy something that isn't available yet?
Relax relax. I was hesitant to use a coating in the first place and am disappointed in the results after 2 weeks with iron deposits. Shame on me. I have not ruled out coatings completely. Like I said, just disappointed. I will try another one from a known company here at AG and go from there. Looking at Opt Coat and WG Ceramic. See if my results are the same. This kit does bead like crazy that is for sure! Better beading than I get with Collinite 845.
So everyone simmer down now... LOL My post was impulsive![]()
According to him it has been tested the last year and a half all over the Country. It's acrylic. Was a short period he offered the kit pre release. I jumped on it.
Odd that you mentioned scratch resistance earlier.... If my memory serves me right, in general, acrylics (ie plexiglass) are usually quite a bit easier to scratch compared to glass. Maybe that does not hold true when broken down to a super thin automotive coating layer.
The only other coating that I am believe was an acrylic (which is by no means all of them as there are new coatings popping up every hour... as this thread proves) was Americana Ameriarmour (and perhaps Americoat as well). Both were stupid easy to apply, but my personal testing with Ameriarmour left a lot to be desired.
Both are now no longer in existence as far as I know... I guess what I am getting at is there is probably a reason that silica (glass) coatings dominate the market and acrylic ones do not. Just a hunch as I don't actually have any background in designing and formulating nano coatings.