Review and Extreme Testing: Opti-Coat 2.0 and CQuartz

Great review!!! Thanks a lot Corey!! :xyxthumbs:

I was just wondering, if I apply cquartz and generally there's a lil' bit of dust fallout always occurring here, dust and stuff would've settled on the surface I have just applied cquartz to!

Whats the best plan of action in that case? (I need to wipe off the excess coating , but dust lying there!)
 
WOW I cannot believe I missed this thread the first time round!

Corey, this review is simply AMAZING! So thorough, so professional, so well laid out and so well presented.

I can't wait to see a long term follow up of the performance of both coatings. :goodpost::wow:
 
I did my 2011 Camaro this weekend with Opti-Coat 2. For one thing, it was actually above 50 degrees for a rare time since last October, however the sun was in and out of clouds, so no pictures can do the project justice (not in Florida you know)...

A bit about the new Camaro - the only way I can describe this car is "sex on wheels". Nuff said. Its an amazing color - factory option called "Red Jewel Tint Coat"...its hard to describe it, but it looks different depending on the lighting conditions. In the direct sun it sparkles like a rare ruby jewel, and in the shade, its almost a dark maroon color (the metallic flake coating reflects light like a diamond. The car therefore had 4 coatings from the factory (thus an option) - primer, base color, metallic tint flake, and lastly the clear coat. Its therefore imperative that I take care of this paint because I seriously doubt that any body shop could ever "reproduce" the look that this car's factory paint has. I ordered the dealer "don't even think about prepping this car". I basically brought home a new, but filthy car. That was fine by me as I knew they didn't lay a hand or a machine on it. I did the usual new car prep including claying the car, even though it was literally 1 week from being built in Oshawa Canada. I actually got an email from the Oshawa production line manager when the car was built. I didn't need to correct the paint, but just polish and seal. I put on Collinite 915 for winter protection and the product was still on the car as this past weekend. Amazing wax.

OK, I decided after months of contemplation to make the move to apply Opti-Coat. I bought the car last fall, so it went through a northeast winter, and it was a heck of a lot of work to keep this car clean. I wanted to make my life easier, and because the paint was in like-new condition and a unique looking car in my neighborhood, I wanted to keep it that way the easiest way possible. I love cars but I also have a life and working every weekend for hours on my car is not sustainable.

I started with a good wash using CG Citrus Wash & Gloss at stripping strength. I then clayed the car again, and it was incredibly clean, but I took care of the paint since the time I received it, so I was not surprised it was in good shape. I probably didn't even need to clay, but I did to remove any Collinite still left on the paint. Collinite is a bear to remove. I then polished the car to a super high gloss using Wolfgang Finishing Glaze with a 5.5" tangerine Hydro Tech pad/DA polisher. Great pad, and an even better polish. I then did an 10% IPA wipe down to remove the polishing oils left from the polishing process. The paint was as clean as it could be - just touching it with anything produced a squeak, so I knew it was ready for the major event - OptiCoat 2.

After doing a lot of research on this, I decided to use a disposable sprayer to apply the product to the foam pad, instead of using the syringe. I soon discovered this was a mistake because spraying also dissipates the product into a fine mist, which means if there is even a small breeze blowing, it will go wherever it wants to. You also better make sure you point the sprayer perfectly onto the pad, or else, you just wasted it. I'm not saying using the syringe is much better, but at least I could easily direct the product with more control. If you have experience with spray products (Optimum Hyper Polish comes to mind), spraying is sometimes more of a challenge to get it right than you think. Its not an accurate way to dispense product, and when you only get 20cc, any wasted product is a very bad thing. I hope that a better way to apply this product to the foam pad is developed at some point.

OK, now for the application to the paint - I wish I had more experience before starting this, but after one panel I soon discovered that I was applying too much. Its a really easy thing to do if you have never touched this stuff before. After several areas didn't flash after a couple of minutes, I knew I had to smooth those areas out. Its a bit nerve shattering because all the time in your head you are saying to yourself "this is a permanent coating on a perfect-paint conditioned car, and you have one shot at this". If I could give any advice, its to not think too much about that part of it. I also had my neighbor drooling over the car at some point and I was distracted by him walking around the car. Another piece of advice...make sure you have 100% concentration and make sure if possible that you will have total focus on what you are doing. Now I realize that this product has a bit of time (like 30 minutes) to level out any spots that have not flashed off, but it is nerve racking as heck if you have never tried this before. I'm not going to lie about it.

After the first panel was perfect and I waited for my neighbor to go home, I soon got the hang of it and the rest went very nicely. I needed to get that first panel out of the way and to go back to using the syringe instead of the sprayer. Had I did another car before this, it would have been a piece of cake, so I would say that you should spend the extra money and get enough for 2 cars - the first to practice on a daily beater perhaps.

I used about 15cc, but I know I wasted some (or started applying too much), so I think I used the right amount once I knew the proper technique. It really is easier that I thought but those first few minutes where something I needed to go through. I am leaving the car sit in the garage for 24 hours to allow it to cure. I know you can drive it in rain within 1 hour of applying but I have the luxury of leaving it sit and cure.

There seems to be a lot of talk about the fact that this product doesn't leave a slick, smooth texture to it. Well think about it - its not a sealant or a wax - its like what perfectly clean clear coat feels like. Makes sense right? I will be applying some CarPro Reload spray on top in a few days (after my first official wash). I have researched that Reload will make it slicker than (well this is a family forum, so let's just say, it should really be nice and slick and glossy after topping it. Also applying a spray wax like Optimum Car Wax is what a lot of guys are topping off with.

I will post some pictures when the sun comes out (any week now)...so you can see this really amazing paint, plus by then I should have the Reload applied to really make it pop. I'm after two things here - to get maximum protection possible from the new coating, and to make routine weekly maintenance fast and easy (but make the car look like I worked hours on it).

To sum up:
1) The product needs a better method to apply it to the foam pad. I'd pass on using a sprayer bottle.
2) You should practice using this product on a daily beater first.
3) You need total focus - its not like waxing a car, avoid distractions.
4) You need to get the car outside. It doesn't mater how good your shop or garage is lit - when you roll it outside, you will see imperfections you never saw in the garage, and you need to do this within 30 minutes of applying this stuff or you could be in for some problems. I would recommend that if at all possible that you do it outside in natural light. Shining a halogen or LED light on it isn't the same thing. Check every angle, get on your knees, lie on your back, whatever it takes to get every angle checked for areas that are not flashing off because you really have to address that within a limited time frame.
 
:iagree: Nice work Fox!!

btw: In the temperatures I was working in there was not 30 minutes of time in which to level OC. I think its best to level it asap.
 
Fox, the last 2 cars I did (GT-R and the Concorde) were done with OC (the original). I just did a Solstice with CQ. It is so much easier. Period. OC needs to become more user friendly. It can be done and done well, it's just compared to CQ you gotta wonder why?
 
Fox, the last 2 cars I did (GT-R and the Concorde) were done with OC (the original). I just did a Solstice with CQ. It is so much easier. Period. OC needs to become more user friendly. It can be done and done well, it's just compared to CQ you gotta wonder why?

Have you used OC2.0, Richy? I've not used the original OC, but I wouldn't call OC2.0 user-unfriendly so I'm curious how you think the two compare.

I've got some CQuartz coming in and will be using it on a couple cars next week so it will be interesting to see how it compares to OC2.0 from an application standpoint.
 
Richy...I was honestly leaning towards CQuartz for the exact reason that you mentioned...more user friendly from what others were saying. I guess what finally made me go with OptiCoat is that I really trust what Dr G knows about clear coat technology, and what's more important...how to make a product that will protect it indefinitely, and actually be harder and better than the original clear coat itself. That to me was the deciding factor, and not its ease of use. I think I made the right decision. It looks stunning, and now that it is raining again up here, I will soon find out if it protects, and is as easy to maintain as advertised and given the testimonials by many others who have used it.

I'm not sure how the delivery system can be made better given the small amount of product needed...or else I'd be booking a flight to Tennessee, but I'm sure the next generation will remedy that.
 
I wish I have the time to just come demonstrate usage for each of you guys who are a nervous wreck about the application. I'm certain I would have you singing a different tune about Opti Coat being hard to apply. I can put it on just like Opti Seal and in about the same time. There is no need to go back over it to removes residues like you do with sealants and waxes...you just wipe it on, check your work, and you are done. In the video I made, I showed 3 different ways to get it to the paint and none of them are wasteful and none of them had high spots to knock down.

We have also been deliberately over-applying to see how hard correcting thick areas actually is without fully removing the coating. We have come to the conclusion that the high spots can be knocked down without the need to start over. Removing the high spots is not as difficult as we suspected. Some softer paints have only needed Poli Seal and a light cutting pad to level and just about all have been able to be removed with a single pass of Polish II or Hyper Polish. To be clear, this is only removing the thick area stain and not striking through the coating, so no reapplication is necessary unless you get carried away. I hope this helps settle your minds a bit, by knowing there's an easy fix if you miss a spot.
 
Aggressive Scratch Test:
I tried to do a scratch test as requested by many members. First let me say this paint isn’t the softest in the world so this test doesn’t prove too much. I wish I had a panel with very soft paint so I could do that test. With this particular paint I didn’t find much difference if any. My test may have been too aggressive. Anyway, in time I plan to polish this panel to perfection and do a better looking test but I thought I’d share this for now.

A course pad was place under a full jug of juice so that the weight placed on the pad was not a variable.

The right side is OC and the left side is CQ. In the middle there was a tape line which is no lsp.



Video:


01NoLSP.jpg


02OC.jpg


03CQ.jpg


OptiCoat 2.0 Side

04OC.jpg


Cquartz Side

05CQ.jpg
 
Cool. Thanks Cee Dog for ever improving the knowledge base.

I would think that just about anything with much force behind it would easily cut through the protection and cause damage. Perhaps there is some way to simulate an abrasive action equal to that of a method of car washing.
 
This is the best comparo thread to date, Corey! I can't imagine the effort and time involved in thinking it up, putting it together, doing the tests, recording them, writing the review, and posting. I feel like I owe you!

I am going to link this to a customer who is considering the coatings so he can see just how good they really are!

Thanks again!!!
 
Cool. Thanks Cee Dog for ever improving the knowledge base.

I would think that just about anything with much force behind it would easily cut through the protection and cause damage. Perhaps there is some way to simulate an abrasive action equal to that of a method of car washing.

I completely agree! I almost didn't post this but I had already done it and thought I should still post it. The failure is on me though! Not the coatings. I am going to polish the panel into shape and then redo the test using only a dry low quality mf towel.


This is the best comparo thread to date, Corey! I can't imagine the effort and time involved in thinking it up, putting it together, doing the tests, recording them, writing the review, and posting. I feel like I owe you!

I am going to link this to a customer who is considering the coatings so he can see just how good they really are!

Thanks again!!!

That is extremely kind! Thank you :).

Btw: I'll do a better job with the next scratch test. I got carried away but I did learn something. The next test should benefit from my failure on this one.
 
Last edited:
WOW - How on God's Green Earth do you have the time to do a review like that?!?!?!?!? Very impressive...... do you get a little bit extra or is that for fun?!?!!? You absolutely 100% earned that trophy you received for sure :dblthumb2:.
 
WOW - How on God's Green Earth do you have the time to do a review like that?!?!?!?!? Very impressive...... do you get a little bit extra or is that for fun?!?!!? You absolutely 100% earned that trophy you received for sure :dblthumb2:.

Thank you!! That is very kind! I don't sleep as much as I should and I spend my "fun time" on it. LOL. No, I do the testing as a hobby. I paid for both coatings. I really enjoy detailing, experiments of any kind, and I love writing. This combines all 3.

Thanks again!
 
Thanks Corey for your time, i guess you like doing such experiments,
i guess you just saw our small video with the scotch brite scratching, and tried to do the same..
1 thing though.. we done it water wet! , your test is same as sand papering the surface when its dry, i guess this course pad you used is similar to 1500 grit sanding, if not more.
you should have done it wet, since no one wash his car without lubricant liquid.

i dont want to flatter myself, though both pics of CQ and OC are scratched hard, if you look very carefully , it looks like CQ side has little less scratch yet. maybe its only me...:xyxthumbs:

thank you for your time again..
Avi
 
Corey, like we were talking about on L2D chat, it will benefit everyone greatly to have a realistic test that tests the coatings in a way that would reflect the kind of challenges that face any surface protection. The difficulty lies in creating a test that is aggressive enough yet still is realistic to everyday car care. I'm hoping rubbing a coarse mf across a dry surface will be enough to induce some marks as that would be a good, reasonable, appropriate test. If not, back to the drawing board. Thanks so much for your continued efforts!!:dblthumb2:
 
This idea is from somebody else and has been applied several times, but I'm not sure its an ideal test method. In your quest for softer paint, you could take it to the extreme and do a test on CD surfaces. They scratch super easy and their reflectivity makes it super easy to evaluate damage. You could get 9 blank CDs for a couple dollars or less, run a control and two treatments standardizing the variables as you did before. Best case scenario, visible damage would occur at the moment the coating was compromised with the CDs. I have no idea how well the polycarbonate surface of a cd would act as a bonding surface for these compounds. You could coat a couple CDs, let them cure, and see if if the coatings appeared to hold up to water, MF polishing, etc as you did before. If you're going to put the test together you should run it more than once to demonstrate consistency. Sorry to be suggesting you spend more of your time on this! I'm in strong support of all your tests. Perhaps you could have a paypal donations button on your detailing site.
 
Last edited:
Hm, well that's kinda disappointing. My Kia appears to have extremely soft paint and after one winter it is very badly swirled up (almost as bad as your extreme test). I hoped i could use OC or CQ as a last resort scratch protection if the damage reoccurs during next winter. If i polish major scratches every year ill cut right through the clearcoat before i resell the car...

I suspect the larger part of the damage was inflicted by frequent snow-sweeping, as the scratches are very long, parallel and in arcs corresponding to sweeping motions. The bristles don't feel particularly harsh, but i guess i'll start looking for a gentler broom or a different method of snow removal.
 
Back
Top