Setec Astronomy
Well-known member
- Aug 31, 2010
- 17,035
- 1,323
They didn't...
Rinseless Washes - 2022
- Thread starter noorth
- Start date
SNP209
Active member
- Sep 26, 2016
- 942
- 218
They did...
Klasse Act
Well-known member
- Feb 21, 2012
- 27,705
- 2,710
I hope the product is successful, I mean if not, the name says it all
All kidding aside, I watched the video, seems like a great concept, better than trying to use AMMO NYC WW foaming product because your not "pushing the foam around"
️Sorry to bring this up but I'm "that guy", once again it's 1 bucket, atleast there's a grit guard. Did you see that foam turning brown upon swiping the panels...NO WAY that's going back into the wash solution bucket, EVER!! He said that car hadn't been washed in FOUR MONTHES, why do these guys all seem to think that 1BM is perfectly OK to do, it's all about being safe
Weeks ago I showed those guys from Indiana how to do a RW, using Feynlab v3 RW and we changed out the rinse bucket 3 times, 3rd time was his call and I've saved that picture of washing my g/f's old Cruze with about 2 weeks worth of dirt/muck, look at this again:
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Ive got the Optimum Hyper Foam rinseless wash. Bought a gallon of it then realized that foam and rinseless don't really work together. The foam gets in all the cracks/panel joints/emblems and if it doesn't get rinsed out it dries in those places.
However I use the Optimum Hyper Foam without allowing it to foam and it works very good like that. Think it cleans better than the blue ONR.
However I use the Optimum Hyper Foam without allowing it to foam and it works very good like that. Think it cleans better than the blue ONR.
Setec Astronomy
Well-known member
- Aug 31, 2010
- 17,035
- 1,323
I didn't watch the video, but I'm surprised they jumped on the FoamNR bandwagon, especially since I thought N-914 was already a surfactant-based product which would foam, sort of. I've never used/bought N-914, I still have my bottle of Meg's D114 or whatever their rinseless was, that inspired N-914.
Setec Astronomy
Well-known member
- Aug 31, 2010
- 17,035
- 1,323
By the time im ready for version 6 they will have version 7 out.
Setec Astronomy
Well-known member
- Aug 31, 2010
- 17,035
- 1,323
Texchappy
Well-known member
- Mar 13, 2015
- 979
- 327
Just finished my bottle of Version 2
Going Mobile
Member
- Aug 24, 2009
- 77
- 24
Coatingsarecrack
Well-known member
- Dec 9, 2018
- 7,882
- 569
Well someone has to take one for the team but can I suggest Labocosmetica Idrosave first
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Funny Idrosave got its launch and was product tested by Eddie…. Might not be in yours orcI arsenal if not for him.
Well he is the reason why it’s in mine…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Coatingsarecrack
Well-known member
- Dec 9, 2018
- 7,882
- 569
Tried foaming N 914…. Not good.
For foam Frothe the Goat. Foam dissipates away leaving no film.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Klasse Act
Well-known member
- Feb 21, 2012
- 27,705
- 2,710
The new McKee's 37 rinseless sponge and drying towel look really cool but I don't understand the logic of making one side black. Personally, I prefer lighter colors so you can see if it's clean or not. I must be in a minority since the DIY legacy sponge has a black side and they didn't change the color when they recently revised it.
I pretty much always end up with a clean bucket using the 1 bucket rinseless method but I am spraying the car down first with Primus 2.0 and then rinsing it off. I also added another step by wringing out the sponge outside of the bucket before I dunk it again. I feel this gets rid of a lot of the dirt before reloading it with rinseless.Sorry to bring this up but I'm "that guy", once again it's 1 bucket, atleast there's a grit guard. Did you see that foam turning brown upon swiping the panels...NO WAY that's going back into the wash solution bucket, EVER!! He said that car hadn't been washed in FOUR MONTHES, why do these guys all seem to think that 1BM is perfectly OK to do, it's all about being safe
Weeks ago I showed those guys from Indiana how to do a RW, using Feynlab v3 RW and we changed out the rinse bucket 3 times, 3rd time was his call and I've saved that picture of washing my g/f's old Cruze with about 2 weeks worth of dirt/muck, look at this again:
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Klasse Act
Well-known member
- Feb 21, 2012
- 27,705
- 2,710
Coatingsarecrack
Well-known member
- Dec 9, 2018
- 7,882
- 569
Well, it is called F-914
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
No he was talking about trying to foam the OG n-914. I too assuming it was surfactant base it would foam well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Klasse Act
Well-known member
- Feb 21, 2012
- 27,705
- 2,710
Ohhh, that makes sense because it looked like it foamed in the video
I'll tell you what, Labocosmetica 2pH for RW...it's a wrap
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Coatingsarecrack
Well-known member
- Dec 9, 2018
- 7,882
- 569
Ohhh, that makes sense because it looked like it foamed in the video
I'll tell you what, Labocosmetica 2pH for RW...it's a wrap
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Yeah I think F 914 is sumilar in chemistry n914 with more surfactants. Doubt I’ll every get around to trying n or f 914
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Setec Astronomy
Well-known member
- Aug 31, 2010
- 17,035
- 1,323
I'm just surprised that M37 either did a "why didn't we think of that??" or were concerned they were going to lose market share that they came out with their own (to add to the what...14 other RW's McKee's sells?). I mean no one here said, when FoamNR came out, "it's about time someone did that" or "every line should have a foaming rinsless"...it was more like a confused shrug.