Today's Tragedy

When Peter sliced off the roman soldiers ear, do you think that was self defense or a violent act?

Is it not in the act of defense for Peter to protect his King? Would you consider it violence or defense if someone was trying to kill a family member of yours and you had to intervene ?

So to answer you question I do not think Peter was a violent man and I think this was done as an act of defense.


Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
 
Josh he doesn't have it right. It is clearly in the Bible not to be meek and to let persons that want to do us or others harm let be. I love Jesus and I will put lead in a bad guy without a second thought about it.

I have no problem with religion. The issue I have is when trying to engage in a practical conversation, such a the one we are currently involved in, and there is a person, or people, who spout passages as a solution to everything. I am sure most are aware, more wars are waged in the name of religion than any other reason. Yet, when a discussion of self defense comes up, certain individuals are thou shall not kill... yet the entire belief system they embrace is responsible for a LOT of death and destruction.
 
I didn't proof read. You get my point. A-train said it better than I anyway.

You never answered my question. If the boogie man comes to visit tonight........?

Jesus said it better then both of you

Depends on what time they come. If it's past 11:30 I'll probaly be snoozing. Hope they're quiet and don't wake me up. I have a devil of a time going back to sleep sometimes

I just cannot bare to argue with bible thumpers... You protect yourself with your beliefs and your bible, I will use other means. If that offends you... well... so be it.

I'm not offended Josh. I appreciate you letting me have this conversation with you without it running off the tracks

I'm gonna start praying for you and your family

He did that to defend Jesus.

And Jesus told him to put his sword away then went and healed the ear of the person who came to kill him

Is any of this getting through yet?

Fixed again :xyxthumbs:

Gotta admit. I LOL at this :dblthumb2:

Josh he doesn't have it right. It is clearly in the Bible not to be meek and to let persons that want to do us or others harm let be. I love Jesus and I will put lead in a bad guy without a second thought about it.

The bible I have says "The meek shall inherit the earth"

Is it not in the act of defense for Peter to protect his King? Would you consider it violence or defense if someone was trying to kill a family member of yours and you had to intervene ?

So to answer you question I do not think Peter was a violent man and I think this was done as an act of defense.


Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk

I guess we all have our own interpertation. Mine is; it was an act of love and desperation
 
Here's my wife with her "new" 1911 I refurbished for her...

[video=youtube_share;enIvo7BRhgE"]The wife with her new 1911. - YouTube[/video]

No offense intended but your wife cant shoot if her life depended on her, which defeats the purpose of having a gun to begin with. Teach her to hold the handgun properly, weaver stance in order to get rid of that horrible recoil. Your ex military right?
 
No offense intended but your wife cant shoot if her life depended on her, which defeats the purpose of having a gun to begin with. Teach her to hold the handgun properly, weaver stance in order to get rid of that horrible recoil. Your ex military right?

Are you kidding me? This is her second time shooting this particular pistol.
 
I can shoot my duty weapon (G22) or a .45 kimber, no difference in my stance and the way I hold my weapon. Just saying.

I can see this thread getting closed real soon. When you mix politics with religion, you will never come to an agreement. Thats why Islam had been more or less at war for the last 2,000 years. Auto Detailing & quality products bring us together here at Autogeek, and a few opinions seperate us in an instant.

The facts are children are dead because of 1 low life. The weapons debate will never end just like politics will never end.
 
I can shoot my duty weapon (G22) or a .45 kimber, no difference in my stance and the way I hold my weapon. Just saying.

I can see this thread getting closed real soon. When you mix politics with religion, you will never come to an agreement. Thats why Islam had been more or less at war for the last 2,000 years. Auto Detailing & quality products bring us together here at Autogeek, and a few opinions seperate us in an instant.

The facts are children are dead because of 1 low life. The weapons debate will never end just like politics will never end.

And I can pick up any weapons platform and be quite proficient with it. My Wife is not a precision shooter, LEO or military. She is a recreational shooter. Just saying.

EDIT:

And there is a difference in grip from pistol to pistol. For example, if you "Glock grip" an H&K, your thumb will likely ride the slide release and cause the slide not to lock open on the last round.
 
Sounds like you've got it all figured out

No it doesn't, it sounds more like he actually knows what he's talking about. Thinking that in a SHTF situation that a prayer is going to save yourself or your family isn't what God had in mind. Although a bible has been known to stop a bullet and I would certainly welcome a stack of them all around me were I in a gunfight.

I am not sure where it was suggested that a AR was the best choice for home defense in this thread, might have missed it, if so I apoligize. That being said, when used for the task, with the right bullet, such as a Black Hills 40gr or the Hornady TAP 55gr, over penetration really isn't an issue. Plus there are highly frangible rounds that'll literally stop as soon as they hit anything. Especially when compared to every other rifle cartridge out there (except a .22 which would just make an intruder angry).

Rifles in the home I think is your concern (and I totally understand that concern). Yes, a high powered rifle isn't what you would want in a home environment as a first choice because of your concerns. The .223 however is very controllable, with the right ammo, in that situation.

If having to choose, and having the time to choose, then the ol' shotgun is BY FAR a better choice for home defense. Something about the sound of a pump shotgun that just gets people's attention. ;)

Either of the above is probably a better choice however than a large caliber pistol in a home defense situation. Today's most popular pistol loads, 9mm, .40cal, .45 cal by all modern testing, will all penetrate 13" ~ 15" even after passing through sheet metal, drywall, glass, etc. This means you can shoot through a wall, then completly through a person. Or perhaps the person then a wall.

It is when people do not understand or are unfamiliar with weapons that the only thing they return to is fear of any/all weapons. Fear is dangerous and gets people hurt. (For instance, take a look at someone at a gun range that has no experience with a large caliber pistol, put that pistol in their hands and have them fire it. You will see someone that has fear. And, they might get hurt without proper supervision.)

Repect and knowledge of weapons is what keeps people from getting hurt. Plus it really expands the fun factor. :)

The key in any situation where 'lethal force' would be called into play is knowing your target. You never pull a gun that you are not prepared to fire. (In other words, DO NOT back someone down with a gun, that's just stupid.) Moving back to using force; This means you know EXACTLY what and where your target is, and EXACTLY what is behind it. If there is anything alive behind your target, taking a shot at that target it is just stupid. In my experience... there is no cure for stupid btw.

You would have to be a Christian to comprehend where I am coming from. I understand your confusion. There was a time I thought like you do

This statement is what prompted my reply, which is concerning to me, and slightly disrespectful. As if one must be an Atheist to own a firearm? Or perhaps to even realize a firearm is a morally acceptable choice in life. I don't think so.

I have been a Christian all my life, from the time I was a child, and reaffirmed my faith as a late teenager. I have seen things in the myriad of church's I have attended (mainly Pentecostal & Baptist) that will give anyone goose bumps. (Good goose bumps) :) I have seen, have been a part of, and TOTALLY believe in miracles! :)

That however does not mean I am willing to stick my head in the sand when the situation requires I defend my loved ones or they defend themselves. Nor does it mean any of us would search out and/or look for trouble.

In the name of relegion, humans have committed horrors and have been killing one another for thousands upon thousands of years, and do so as we speak. Many more have died in the name of "God" than via crime, disease, alcohol and drugs combined. Men have hidden behind their version of "God" that suited their twisted purpose for centuries, and will continue till the end of time.

The "God" that has been called upon throughout the time is surely, at one time or another, the very same God I worship. The same God that gives me the strength and faith to know I would be doing the right thing by protecting my loved ones with deadly force. The only person I would have to answer to in fact is my God and he is the one that will accept and forgive me should I harm another person. Our God lives within, and we do not need acceptance from 'man' but from within.

The horrible tradegy that we are discussing is unthinkable. Should the gunman be alive, God would never forgive him, man would never forgive him. In fact, I have a feeling that many men would have already taken him out by now. It is beyond all reason how a human could do what he did, but then again how about Hitler? Never could wrap my mind around that one either.

What is really wierd is this tradegy might just be construed as "terrorism".
en.wikipedia.org/####/Terrorism
Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for a religious, political or, ideological ...



Under that blanket approach considering the horrific devices/weapons used along the way. Are we to outlaw all bus stops? After all, there have been bombs at them which have killed hundreds. Perhaps busses too....

We are blessed to live in a country that allows us the freedoms we enjoy. The freedom to buy what we want. To say what we want. To have children without the fear of the government storming down our doors. To worship and practice religion of all faiths. Unless one lives in a country without our freedoms then *that* is when they fail to understand.

One need not be a "Christian" to understand, just that they understand, to be a "Christian".

Cardaddy - aka/Tony
 
I can see this thread getting closed real soon. When you mix politics with religion, you will never come to an agreement.



Like I've been saying for years, the fastest way to start a Flame War on a forum is to bring up one of these three subjects...

  • Politics
  • Religion
  • Car Wax
As ridiculous as that sounds, it's all too often true... :laughing:


I've been watching this thread, I like to read other people's opinions, lets me know where they're coming from. So far none of the Moderators have closed it so as long as it continues at a mature level they won't be forced to close it.


Sometimes it's easy to post something you'll regret later, when in doubt, instead of hitting the [Submit Reply] button, maybe save your text to another word processing document and then,

Push away from the keyboard...


Go for a walk... think about what's really important in life and then when you come back to your computer, re-read what you wrote and then decide if it's important enough to post.

Lots of times if you're instincts tell you you're uncomfortable posting what you've written... that's a pretty good sign to click away and maybe go to another thread and see if you can help someone...


:)
 
No one believes that we do not need to revisit the gun laws and come up with some sort of solution, if not a solution, at least start a dialogue that is not political but based on reason and public safety. I don't know what the answers are but we have to get all parties together and form some initial plan of action.

I have been a hunter all my life. I recall my first rabbit hunt with my dad over fifty years ago. From that I've graduated to hunting mule deer, whitetail, antelope, etc. I DO NOT want to give up my hunting guns! Not because I am foolish enough to believe the ridiculous notion that an armed civilian militia is necessary to defend our land from outside sources or our own corrupt government, but because I want to enjoy target shooting and hunting as a recreation. I have the right to do that. But I do not need military weapons capable of firing 40 rounds per minute to enjoy my sport.

I was a Federal Law Enforcement officer for over 25 years and a firearms instructor for two squads a good part of that time. I am familiar and well versed with weapons of the assault variety and the rapid deployment of firepower, both with long weapons and handguns. I am here to tell you that from my experience, no civilian needs or should even want such weapons for recreation. There are a few, rare civilian jobs that may require this but those people are well trained. The rest should be in the hands of military and law enforcement personnel. I would create a list of these weapons and have them turned in. If someone says they just paid $800 for such a rifle I would simply say I am sorry, even to a law abiding citizen and even to a federal agent or police officer who has such a weapon for personal rather than official use. There would be huge penalties imposed for anyone not complying and mandated prison time for anyone committing a crime with such a weapon. Of course, this won't happen but that is what I would do if I were King. Incidentally, if anyone thinks that there is anything better than a 12 ga. shotgun for home defense purposes simply does not know a thing about weapons.

Any time a civilian has access to equal or greater firepower than a police officer you have a tragedy in the making. I have seen such tragedies up close more than once.
 
Last edited:
Well I have read all the posts on this thread and I have to say that the Moderators on AGO are more lean-ant than other auto sites that I visit.I am not a big fan of guns at all but one thing I have learned is to not get in any debates with gun owners and their reasons of ownership.I have a 6 year old son and could not fathom this happening at his school.I know that GOD loves HIS world and all the people(good and bad)that is allowed to occupy it.We all need to pray for the victims and families as well as the survivors of this horrific tragedy as they will be scared for life.
 
Shortspark, thank you for your assessment. You have excellently put into words what I was thinking.

P.S. I agree that this thread went well. I was certainly in the minority, but at no time did I feel that I was attacked for my beliefs. Thank you gentlemen one and all.
 
Sheesh, what one evening will do!!!.

I agree with Mike that before hitting the submit button we do need to take a moment to take into consideration all consequences of our actions. I will go one step further as to tie this to our conversation and say that not only do our action carry consequences...... but also our inaction.

In any case, to follow the wave of what you guys were talking about, some people find comfort in scientific principles (ie. Newton's law of motion: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction) and draw wisdom from empirical data and studies, and others find comfort and wisdom through biblical scriptures. We could argue till the end of days as to which process produces the better result, and unfortunately the debate would end up in a stalemate as BOTH are wrong..... and BOTH are right. In both cases you depend on man's interpretation which is flawed.

A Christian man is no less a sinner than an atheist, and therefore his reasoning and earthly validations are no less flawed then the atheist. God did give us "free will" and did not discriminate between the Christian or atheist. How we choose to go through life (and exercise our free will) is purely an individual process. We do get external and internal influences which mold us in the person we are, but regardless our thinking and actions will remain flawed, as we CANNOT take into consideration all possible avenues and consequences.

Instead of flaming one another on "flawed" interpretations of scriptural references (which speak to each of our heart differently), or flawed "scientific" demographics, why don't we see what this thread actually brings. Having read all of it, and thought about it, and prayed about it, I can tell you that we have MAJOR nuggets of truths buried under the surface of what was shared. Here are but a few of those:

1) Training
2) Experience
3) Knowledge
4) Guidance
5) Comfort level
6) Willingness to get involved
7) Willingness to accept consequences and responsibilities

How much training do you have in handling an AR15? How much responsibilities (personal or societal) are you willing to take? How competent are you? etc....

My training, expertise, ballistic knowledge, tactical knowledge, marksmanship, comfort handling all types of weapons, moral compass, etc.... etc.... makes it that I feel (personal statement) very comfortable in saying that I am not only safe to handle anything from handguns to fully automatic machine gun to protect myself..... and others. But I have also shown enough proficiency that a board of my peers saw it fit to issue me a certificate of approval (license).

The answer to gun control is not to RESTRICT but to TRAIN and EDUCATE.

CCW holders show proficiency with handguns in close combat scenario to "stop a confrontation". Advance tactical and combat training prepares you for just that with higher grade weapons. As I may have said previously (don't remember if it was in this thread, because I am having this conversation on many forums) I do believe that we should have a licensing process, BUT I completely disagree that Uncle Sam should require you to serialize your inventory, or limit your ability to own, or limit the quantity of what you should own etc.... I am not going to go into a rant about why, but I will say a few thing which may put it in perspective

1) Eminent domain
2) Patriots Act
3) Homeland Security
----> We can have that discussion another time.

Under the Constitution, I have a right and a duty to protect myself (and others). Since our Constitution and our Legal system were inspired by Bible precepts, you will find many scriptures referencing your rights and duties to protect yourself, and others. But before jumping in, and for the sake of the people around, you should be asked to show some degree of proficiency.

--> Would you give a rotary buffer with an aggressive pad on a thin soft paint to a newb? NOPE!

*** But the real question is would you restrict the newb from ever owning one?

Again the answer is not to RESTRICT and outlaw but to TEACH AND EDUCATE!..... and even more importantly, we should exercise that moral compass. You have to understand the consequences of your actions; the good and the evil; blah, blah, blah.

I personally prefer to immerse myself in the bible and learn to polish my moral compass that way, because it suits me best and brings me the best result, but I cannot fault one that exercises it outside of Christian precepts. The point still remains: Practice makes perfect.... and Perfect practice makes for best!

Taking it in a different context, if I had a choice I would rather learn about detailing from Mike Phillips directly, but I can still learn on my own through trials and errors??. The problem arises if you guys restrict me from learning, or from acquiring the right tools, because YOU (flawed people) decided that the "trial and error way" had too many potential downfalls. This way you adjucate yourself authority over all..... when you have none!.

Now back to the original question: Why would a civilian need an AR15? To that, the answer will ALWAYS be that he does not NEED it (under the current state of our Union). We have enough armed forces which we've hired to do that work for us. But what if something changes??

I CHOSE (free will) to get educated and show proficiency with all types of weapons. I CHOSE to be prepared for a wide variety of "What ifs?", despite all who say "it will never happen!", and do practice on a regular basis (to maintain my skill set). Will I ever use my skills? I HOPE AND PRAY I DON'T.... but I am prepared!

Why would you choose to restrict me, alongside everyone else, in a blanketed effort to control something you have no control over? No one can prevent the actions of a mentally deranged person..... but we can prepare for it!. We have too much media coverage "glorifying" mass killings, when we should have more media coverage of citizens getting involved. We should be elevating them for their heroism, bravery and selflessness. ..... but according to our politicians, media, and activist it would send the wrong message and would incite the public to do the same. So according to them it is better for us to stay out of the way and not get involved.

I started this post stating that we do have to understand the consequences of our actions....... but the bigger point is that we also need to understand the consequences of our INACTION!
 
On another note, the company that makes the assault riffle used in this tragedy(FREEDOM) has placed the company up for sale and several of the larger pension funds are and have sold off their investments in FREEDOM.These pension funds have a large teacher base and are reconsidering all of their investments on a moral level.
Bloomberg news.
 
if anyone thinks that there is anything better than a 12 ga. shotgun for home defense purposes simply does not know a thing about weapons.

i guess you know more than massad ayoob.

anyway, weve seen time and again the common factor in any of these types of heinous acts is mental illness which is a much more difficult issue to tackle and one not easily solved.

we know prohibition doesnt work. how many of us dont know or of anyone who cant get their hands on illegal drugs? or prescription drugs other than from your doctor?
 
Last edited:
The answer to gun control is not to RESTRICT but to TRAIN and EDUCATE.

I didn't have time to read your whole post (on my way out the door) but since you bolded this sentence...are you saying that the school shooter should have been better trained and eductated in the use of his weapon?

It seems to me, by having trained CCW-holders in the school, is treating the symptom and not the disease, or to use a different analogy, the root cause of this tragedy is not that the teachers weren't armed, but that a crazy person had a gun. And if the crazy person could have had a knife, a bat, a pipe, a box cutter, etc., then the answer is not gun control, it's crazy person control. This is a long thread and I may have missed it, but has anyone offered up any solution to that?

I just talked to a retired LEO/NRA member, who said that in his day this kid would have been institutionalized and never have been able to hurt anyone, while today they are coddled and left with their parents to steal their guns and kill them.
 
Any time a civilian has access to equal or greater firepower than a police officer you have a tragedy in the making. I have seen such tragedies up close more than once.

First off, thank you for your service. 25 years in law enforcement is a testament to your dedications to serve and protect.

I will agree with the above quote only so far as it pertains to "bad guys". Unfortunately, you will agree with me that it is INEVITABLE. It is inevitable that the production guns will find their way to the street, and inevitable that those guns will be used in the commission of a crime. For goodness sake, we have M16, fully automatic M60, RPG etc... on the black market right here in the good old US of A.... things that are ONLY available to the military. I seriously doubt that the threat of "fines", "jail time" and the addition of new laws will scare those bad guys straight, or will make the availability of those weapons any harder.

With equal fire power comes the need for the balance to be in our favor, and strength comes in numbers.

We have a strained, underpaid, overworked law enforcement system..... and that won't change!. We all have a roll to play regardless if we are paid or volunteering.
 
Back
Top