Uww+ vs garry deans infinite use detail juice

andrewbmw said:
I have done a looottttt of experimenting and should probably start writing reviews for it. I use it a 1:128 WW. I have polished hoods and got them dirty and try to make swirl marks in them. Yes you can still do it at 1:128 but its all about technique. I do a few things different as well. One of the main things is that I saturate the panel with a pump sprayer until its dripping off, then spay a bit on a mf then wipe off using many mf's and not re-introducing dirt into the paint.

I did a lot of testing before I used it on clients cars because I had never used a WW before. I tested a lot of product in many dilution ratios and found out a lot of interesting things.

Even at 1:128 I have not scratched any surfaces of the paint. But all of the cars I do it on are very lightly dirty. I am trying to find someone at meguiars to talk to about this and find out there recommendations and I would like to give them my input to improve the product but cant seem to post on there forum or talk to a rep or something.
Click to expand...


I understand and can appreciate where you are coming from as I to have experimented to come up with other uses and solutions to problems.

But playing a little bit of the "devils advocate" I personally think I would go around suggesting that as a true waterless wash especially when Meg's themselves have not made the same recommendation. I say this thinking mainly of the new member that may not know the full background that just shared and take your word as the law. On a side not I can wash a little dusty car using a MF towel and straight water in bottle like a waterless wash and not scratch anything. It's all in the technique.



With that said, I like D114 as a rinseless wash and UWWP as a waterless. Use the right product for its intended use and you almost can't go wrong.
 
TroyScherer said:

I understand and can appreciate where you are coming from as I to have experimented to come up with other uses and solutions to problems.

But playing a little bit of the "devils advocate" I personally think I would go around suggesting that as a true waterless wash especially when Meg's themselves have not made the same recommendation. I say this thinking mainly of the new member that may not know the full background that just shared and take your word as the law. On a side not I can wash a little dusty car using a MF towel and straight water in bottle like a waterless wash and not scratch anything. It's all in the technique.



With that said, I like D114 as a rinseless wash and UWWP as a waterless. Use the right product for its intended use and you almost can't go wrong.
Click to expand...

Yeah I understand, people should never listen to me or anyone, they should try it out themselves! Anything I try on clients cars I have tested tons of times before I allow anything to touch a clients car. Thats why I said light dirt =) most of the clients I have put 30 miles a week on there car and I wash them every week =) so this is why it would work it this situation. I am still testing it out on my own cars. I have a friend with a black toyota highlander he allows me to test stuff on as well as my own personal cars.

I am still constantly experimenting and finding out new things about these products. Would love to find out more. I need to write a review on it.
 
I'm a detail juice fan. Like it was said before UWW+ and DJ are like splitting hairs. They both do a lot really well. I have to say using DJ as a spray wax is nice. I had it last a month outside no mait. wash.
Besides I go with the Juice I like to support the homegrown small business and help grow. Even better when the product like DJ does what it says it does. It's not insanely more expensive then UWW+ when it's diluted down. I think it's a few dollars more per gallon.
I pull for the little guy all the time especially when his stuff flat out works.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top