This would be the case ONLY when using surbuf pads. It's pretty simple if you think about it. With surbuf pads, you don't want to use pressure(the weight of the polisher). So, with forced rotation being a non-factor, the non-forced rotational DA's(G110v2, GG 6", PCXP) spin and oscillate FASTER than the Flex 3401, therefore, it will correct better. Get it? :xyxthumbs: This may something that is already widely understood, I've just never seen it mentioned. Who would've ever thunk a DA could out-perform the 3401? Opinions?
FWIW, when pressure is needed, the 3401 would easily out-perform a traditional DA.