DFB's Garage

The plan for today was to try a few of the new Koch Chemie products outside of my normal washing routine. Those products being Active Foam, Ceramic Effect Shampoo and Quick & Shine. The test subject being the mildly dirty Wildtrak.

To start, I mixed up some Active Foam. In the past, Active Foam was only available in 10-litre containers, which for someone like me was way overboard, especially at the previous asking price. With AF now available in a consumer friendly 1-litre bottle, I've finally got a chance to try out this soap. And what an amazing soap it is!



AF is a mild-alkaline at a pH of 9.5, meaning it has pre-cleaning ability missing from GSF, but not to the same extent as Super Foam at pH 12.
Active Foam produces lovely thick foam, backed by a long dwell time. It also rinses freely, taking dirt and bugs with it. But the scent, what a scent! I've heard about AF's sandalwood scent being delightful, but that doesn't do it justice. A quick whiff of the bottle is one thing, but once you foam it, the scent takes on a different dimension.................it's transcendent. I know scent doesn't actually affect the cleaning ability of the product, but it certainly improves the user experience. And if you enjoy using a product, you are going to use it more.

On this occasion, I used Active Foam as a wheel and tyre cleaner, then as a pre-cleaner before the contact wash. On both counts, AF is superbly capable.





Following Active Foam, I used CES Ceramic Effect Shampoo as a bucket wash. I typically don't use this type of soap, as in a soap with protection. I often find them a jack of all trades, master of none. Most of them refuse to foam and have a strange stickiness under the wash media. They also lack ultimate cleaning ability. As such, you have to pick your mark with these soaps.



On this occasion, the vehicle is in between coatings, so using a soap like this helps buy me some time. With the surface mostly clean after using Active Foam, CES wasn't ploughing through dirt and grime. This is another pleasantly scented product from KCx, not to the same level as Active Foam, but still a delight. Under the wash pad, CES glides nicely over the surface, then rinses away freely to reveal some decent hydrophobics and lovely slickness. And in that regard, I'd say CES has an edge over some of the other soaps of this type I've sampled.



Following the wash, I then tried Quick & Shine. I've tried this product in the blue bottle range and have always loved how simple it is to use as a drying aid. QS couldn't be simpler to apply, just spray and wipe, quite often you don't even need a secondary towel as it flashes away to a streak free finish. To be clear, this isn't going to provide long term protection, just lubrication while drying and a boost in gloss and slickness..................which is probably all we ever need on well-maintained vehicles.





With the use of CES and QS, they certainly gave the test subject a lovely boost in gloss and slickness.
 
Latest parts haul...................



On the docket for today, I wanted to replace the fuel taps fitted on the Rover and Mulchmaster. I never use the fuel taps on these machines, so I felt like a fuel filter would be a better use of that space. I ended up replacing the fuel hose at the same time, it was pretty hard and locked onto those fuel taps.

https://www.greenacresmowers.com.au/ride-on-mower-fuel-filter-for-briggs-and-stratton~3055
https://www.greenacresmowers.com.au/fuel-line-for-ride-on-mowers-briggs-and-stratton-m





I'll swap out the tap on the Victa C21 at some point as well.

 
303, Perl, Motorplast and Hyper Dressing here.

I totally see why people love Motorplast, but I personally find it a touch rich for my taste. Whereas with Hyper Dressing, I can water that down right out to 6:1 for a natural finish. Nothing wrong with either or any of the previous mentioned products, but I do think Hyper Dressing and finishes out and levels nicer.
I might try Hyper Dressing at some point, all these years I've heard so many people talk about it, yet I've never tried it

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
I might try Hyper Dressing at some point, all these years I've heard so many people talk about it, yet I've never tried it

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
I bought my Hyper Dressing over a year ago, got 2 because they were half price, it was taking me so long to get through even the first one that I gave the other on to my nephew. He used it on both their cars straight away, then on a friend's who was visiting, raved about how easy it was to use, and the results on the friends Sorrento that's never had anything on the trim were amazing.
 
303, Perl, Motorplast and Hyper Dressing here.

I totally see why people love Motorplast, but I personally find it a touch rich for my taste. Whereas with Hyper Dressing, I can water that down right out to 6:1 for a natural finish. Nothing wrong with either or any of the previous mentioned products, but I do think Hyper Dressing and finishes out and levels nicer.
Deyon, this bottle says RTU, are the gallon sizes not RTU, I'd only really need this size honestly.
5d76a0ccdd787674d27898599170f704.jpg


Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
I guess what I really wanted to know is how much they (Megs) cuts it down, i.e. can it be further thinned down

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Correct, the small bottle is RTU, the gallon is a super concentrate.

The RTU is diluted at 1:1, which is way too strong for engine bays. I'd further dilute it again, aim for 4:1.


Meguiar's Hyper Dressing2:1333 ml167 ml500 mlMedium Gloss
3:1375 ml125 ml500 mlSatin Finish
4:1400 ml100 ml500 mlNatural Finish

 
Correct, the small bottle is RTU, the gallon is a super concentrate.

The RTU is diluted at 1:1, which is way too strong for engine bays. I'd further dilute it again, aim for 4:1.


Meguiar's Hyper Dressing2:1333 ml167 ml500 mlMedium Gloss
3:1375 ml125 ml500 mlSatin Finish
4:1400 ml100 ml500 mlNatural Finish

Thanks Deyon, I guess I'll just dump that into a jug, add 32 oz of distilled water which will cut it to 3:1, is that ok for engine bays

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
The plan for today was to try a few of the new Koch Chemie products outside of my normal washing routine. Those products being Active Foam, Ceramic Effect Shampoo and Quick & Shine. The test subject being the mildly dirty Wildtrak.

To start, I mixed up some Active Foam. In the past, Active Foam was only available in 10-litre containers, which for someone like me was way overboard, especially at the previous asking price. With AF now available in a consumer friendly 1-litre bottle, I've finally got a chance to try out this soap. And what an amazing soap it is!



AF is a mild-alkaline at a pH of 9.5, meaning it has pre-cleaning ability missing from GSF, but not to the same extent as Super Foam at pH 12.
Active Foam produces lovely thick foam, backed by a long dwell time. It also rinses freely, taking dirt and bugs with it. But the scent, what a scent! I've heard about AF's sandalwood scent being delightful, but that doesn't do it justice. A quick whiff of the bottle is one thing, but once you foam it, the scent takes on a different dimension.................it's transcendent. I know scent doesn't actually affect the cleaning ability of the product, but it certainly improves the user experience. And if you enjoy using a product, you are going to use it more.

On this occasion, I used Active Foam as a wheel and tyre cleaner, then as a pre-cleaner before the contact wash. On both counts, AF is superbly capable.





Following Active Foam, I used CES Ceramic Effect Shampoo as a bucket wash. I typically don't use this type of soap, as in a soap with protection. I often find them a jack of all trades, master of none. Most of them refuse to foam and have a strange stickiness under the wash media. They also lack ultimate cleaning ability. As such, you have to pick your mark with these soaps.



On this occasion, the vehicle is in between coatings, so using a soap like this helps buy me some time. With the surface mostly clean after using Active Foam, CES wasn't ploughing through dirt and grime. This is another pleasantly scented product from KCx, not to the same level as Active Foam, but still a delight. Under the wash pad, CES glides nicely over the surface, then rinses away freely to reveal some decent hydrophobics and lovely slickness. And in that regard, I'd say CES has an edge over some of the other soaps of this type I've sampled.



Following the wash, I then tried Quick & Shine. I've tried this product in the blue bottle range and have always loved how simple it is to use as a drying aid. QS couldn't be simpler to apply, just spray and wipe, quite often you don't even need a secondary towel as it flashes away to a streak free finish. To be clear, this isn't going to provide long term protection, just lubrication while drying and a boost in gloss and slickness..................which is probably all we ever need on well-maintained vehicles.





With the use of CES and QS, they certainly gave the test subject a lovely boost in gloss and slickness.
Some person would say paid for product placement. 🤫
 
Thanks Deyon, I guess I'll just dump that into a jug, add 32 oz of distilled water which will cut it to 3:1, is that ok for engine bays

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

3:1 should be fine, you can always water it down further if needed.

We don't have access to the undiluted gallon size Hyper Dressing anymore in Australia. Last time it was offered, it was a $159.95, which for the average hobbyist is simply overkill, both in price and the amount of product. So, we only get the 946ml RTU bottle, and even then, its priced silly.

I once had someone come back to wondering why his engine bay was a greasy mess after using Hyper Dressing. I was baffled because I've never had it do that. It took me a while, but I eventually figured out what happened. After some questions, I found he sprayed it directly out of the RTU bottle at the pre-determined 1:1. At that dilution, its simply too strong.

I didn't twig initially because I still have a 32oz bottle of undiluted Hyper Dressing that I imported from the USA a number of years ago, so I haven't needed to dilute the RTU bottles yet.

 
Probably.

Meanwhile, that order reduced my bank balance to the tune of $300. So yeah, it was paid review......................paid out of my own wallet.
I look forward to reading your reviews, and I may eventually get some, but I'm really trying to use stuff up before getting anything new. And that's why I gave the FJ a coating of NV Jet today, durability isn't an issue for me.
 
Having a little fun with my latest round of Libre patches.




These are used provide protection for my glucose monitoring sensor. While the sensors have a pretty stout adhesive, I'm paranoid about ripping the sensor off while working in the garden or mowing.

For those that don't know, these Libre sensors are a one-shot deal, once applied they will last 14-days but cannot be reapplied if they fall off or need to be removed, no doubt for sanitary reasons. I actually had to remove one two days in for a CT scan, broke my heart at the time because I didn't have a replacement at home. Back then, they were only available direct from Libre and cost me $95 each..............$200 a month + shipping! They have since been put on the PBS and can be ordered through my normal pharmacy at only $15 each.









The sensors originally needed to be scanned with the camera on my phone or a dedicated meter, but they are now connected via Bluetooth and update the reading every 60-seconds without needing to be scanned. The freedom it has given me can't be measured, I haven't needed to do a proper blood test in many years now, previously I'd be doing those 4 - 8 times a day depending on my condition. These sensors can also talk to an insulin pump, something I haven't pursued.
 
So that little probe/spike stays stuck in your arm while you go about your daily work? I'm a regular blood/plasma donor and don't have a problem with needles, but that freaks me out a little bit.
 
So that little probe/spike stays stuck in your arm while you go about your daily work? I'm a regular blood/plasma donor and don't have a problem with needles, but that freaks me out a little bit.

Correct.

The "spike" is called a filament and despite appearances, it's very short and thin. Apart from the initial install, the filament is rarely ever felt while the sensor is attached. Sometimes will sting for a second or two, but doing that once a fortnight is far preferable to 4 - 8 times a day.
 
3:1 should be fine, you can always water it down further if needed.

We don't have access to the undiluted gallon size Hyper Dressing anymore in Australia. Last time it was offered, it was a $159.95, which for the average hobbyist is simply overkill, both in price and the amount of product. So, we only get the 946ml RTU bottle, and even then, its priced silly.

I once had someone come back to wondering why his engine bay was a greasy mess after using Hyper Dressing. I was baffled because I've never had it do that. It took me a while, but I eventually figured out what happened. After some questions, I found he sprayed it directly out of the RTU bottle at the pre-determined 1:1. At that dilution, its simply too strong.

I didn't twig initially because I still have a 32oz bottle of undiluted Hyper Dressing that I imported from the USA a number of years ago, so I haven't needed to dilute the RTU bottles yet.

I think your good for a while with Hyper Dressing

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
Last week, my cleaner asked me about where in the area to buy a ride-on mower. In a former life, she was an arborist and knows the ins and outs of garden power equipment and therefore had done research on what she wanted.

My first response was where NOT to buy a mower from..............the business that ripped me off twice, treated me like a fool and was basically the catalyst for me doing my own repairs and buying parts online. Because of the machine she had shortlisted, it was actually that shop she had intended on visiting, but my advice put an end to that.

This week I got told a story that I'm not surprised by but certainly makes me angry. Out of interest, she went in to see if my assessment of this business, and the owner in particular, was true. Upon arrival, she explained what she was looking for and was promptly told by the owner that he was "sick of you women coming in here trying to act like you know something about mowers". She replied along the lines of "that's fine", then promptly walked out.

I'm appalled that someone would say such a thing to customer, male or female. I know there were times when I wanted to cut loose on a customer for being rude or unrealistically demanding, but at the end of the day, I knew that wouldn't lead to a favorable outcome for the business I represented. In fact, sometimes those very specific customers became VERY good customers as the relationship developed. One in particular would come in nearly every Friday, often I felt just to say hello. You see, there is a difference between an unrealistically demanding customer, and one that is informed and knowledgeable enough to know exactly what they want. I know this because I am that type of customer myself.

I can't say I'm surprised by this story because he treated me like a complete fool as well. I know first hand how angry he made me feel, actually, he made me look like a fool in front of other customers and his staff. This is the same bullsh.t that inflicts automotive related businesses, treating females like idiots, something you'd hope was a thing of the past but still very much happens.

In this case, this moron lost a sale worth several thousand dollars from his actions. Add that up over countless other people, it's a wonder he is still in business.
 
Probably.

Meanwhile, that order reduced my bank balance to the tune of $300. So yeah, it was paid review......................paid out of my own wallet.
Yeah I know......I was just referring to Flash and his smack talk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFB
Back
Top