WRAPT C5Z06
New member
- Nov 12, 2009
- 12,615
- 0
Similar to menzerna power finish. I like the idea of non diminishing abrasives.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Similar to menzerna power finish. I like the idea of non diminishing abrasives.
Can you get good results using a random orbital polisher?D151
Similar to menzerna power finish. I like the idea of non diminishing abrasives.
Exactly what I want. Basically, a two step polish combined into one, which would be similar to menzerna power finish. Is there anything in the meguiars line that would conquer this using non diminishing abrasives? I like the idea of non diminishing abrasives because you're getting the same correction from start to finish, if I'm not mistaken. Diminishing abrasives seem like the more "you need to know what you're doing" type of polish as you have to know when the abrasives have broken down. I could be way of base...lol.do you want something that will remove light swirls but leave no protection as you'll apply the protection in the next step.
Exactly what I want. Basically, a two step polish combined into one, which would be similar to menzerna power finish. Is there anything in the meguiars line that would conquer this using non diminishing abrasives?
Diminishing abrasives seem like the more "you need to know what you're doing" type of polish as you have to know when the abrasives have broken down.
Will M205 leave more gloss(finish better) than Swirl X?
Will M205 leave more gloss(finish better) than Swirl X?
I will be using Griot's new version 6" ROP for correction. What Lake Country CCS pad should I use with M205 and what speed?
Same questions go for Swirl X.
Thanks :xyxthumbs:
According to Meguiars, Swirl X uses a chemical abrasive while M205 uses SMAT?They should both finish out very clear and leave the paint with a high gloss finish. The SwirlX is more aggressive but that's relative because it's still a light cleaner/polish when compared to a compound.
If you're trying to remove defects, even light defects like micro-marring then use a polishing pad. If you're trying to jewel the paint from very good to dripping wet then use a finishing pad.
Usually for final polishing you want to be at 4.0 to 5.0 or somewhere in-between.
![]()
According to Meguiars, Swirl X uses a chemical abrasive while M205 uses SMAT?
I will not be using another other product(not sure which one of these 2 yet) because my cars defects are not tooooo bad(07 z06). Should I still stick with 4.0-5.0 speed, or jump to 6?
I will using a white CCS pad.
I actually spoke to a guy name Blake at Meguiars and asked him about the technology of both Swirl X and M205. He told me Swirl X uses a chemical abrasive while 205 uses SMAT. I'll take your word for it.Post the link to that source of information. Both use SMAT, it could be SwirlX also uses chemical cleaners as it is a cleaner/polish for use by consumers on daily drivers which means it could contain chemical cleaners for use by consumers on cars with dirty paint.
Last couple questions, I promise.
Will Swirl X remove defects or just fill them?
I assume swirl X will remove any prior wax on the car and leave a good finish so a sealant can bond properly?
Mike Phillips said:I've never walked out into a garage the next day after applying a sealant over a car that was polished and seen a pile of sealant on the garage floor surrounding the car because it didn't bond and slipped off the paint.
See post 16 of the below thread as this topic is discussed there,
Best Product/Methodology To Remove Waxes & Sealants??
Also, there's something to be said for manufactures directions as they know their product's compatibility best since the chemists that formulate the product line make products that will work together with synergistic chemical compatibility.
Of course everyone is free to find their own way that suits there tastes but to say a sealant won't bond to paint because a polish that contained oil was used previously is probably not accurate and I've seen it done for decades.
That doesn't mean all sealants will do this as some are more finicky than others, but that's why I brought up the idea of following the "manufactures" directions for their specific product line. That doesn't mean what one manufactures says about their polymers needing a sterile surface applies to the rest of the industry and I don't think manufactures make recommendations for other company's products, (but sometimes forum members do).
One thing I've learned more and more since joining the AG Team is when it comes to paint care, there is not right or wrong way, just your way.
You're the absolute best, honestly! Thanks!Used correctly it will remove them. I don't know if it will fill any defects I've never used the product incorrectly.
If I only had a nickel for every time the question of fillers and bonding came up on a discussion forum I'd be a zillionaire....
Taken from this page,
If it were my car in my garage I would wipe the SwirlX or M205, whichever you end up using, off the car and apply my favorite wax or paint sealant. Follow the directions for applying and removing the wax or paint sealant and then after the final wipe. stand back and admire the results.
You're the absolute best, honestly! Thanks!rops: