HD speed vs Megs D166

Get Carpro Essence in the lineup for comparison too :xyxthumbs:
 
What about a 50/50 and then a 50/50 hd/Meg's??

Sent from my XT1609 using Tapatalk
 
Yes!!!! HD/megs....absolutely!

Tom
 
Using those hydro tech again with the GG?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 
minerigger said:
Using those hydro tech again with the GG?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I was gonna switch it up, it's a buddies car and said I can use it for tests since the money is all going to hurricane Harvey.

I'm gonna use lc pads on a few panels then boss MF on another, then switch to Biff and shine

Sent from my XT1609 using Tapatalk
 
To stay in the family I'd try D166 topped with ultimate fast finish and boosted once a month with D156. That's what I plan on trying.
 
Uff goes on pretty much just as easy as D156 would it be worth just only using uff?

Sent from my XT1609 using Tapatalk
 
I've been using Megs 151 PRC for about 6 years. When all the hoopla about HD Speed started I bought some to try out. It gave good results but nothing mind blowing. It smells better then 151 but it was impossible to clean out of my pads by hand washing. The PRC is just about the easiest product to clean out of my pads. Maybe this is an indication of better longevity? I was not impressed with the performance to justify the more expensive price. Might try the 166 and see if it's an improvement.
 
sweatthedetails said:
I've been using Megs 151 PRC for about 6 years. When all the hoopla about HD Speed started I bought some to try out. It gave good results but nothing mind blowing. It smells better then 151 but it was impossible to clean out of my pads by hand washing. The PRC is just about the easiest product to clean out of my pads. Maybe this is an indication of better longevity? I was not impressed with the performance to justify the more expensive price. Might try the 166 and see if it's an improvement.
Click to expand...
I see it has an improvement over 151, I have also been using 151 for sometime. It is thicker, has a long working time and cuts better. The wipe off is a breeze. Now all I have left to see is the longevity

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
 
You referring to the 151 being thicker than the speed or the 166? Just got a gallon of 151 coming but may be have to pick up some more things to try out.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 
At least with my gallon, D166 is the least thick. D151 is by far the thickest and HD Speed is only slightly thicker than D166.

D166 is substantially better than D151.
 
Looks like I need to order some 166 come Wednesday when AG starts carrying it, that's if it doesn't sell out instantly

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 
Cruzscarwash said:
Here you go

https://youtu.be/h_6JhJdL37U

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Nice comparo, thanks. The HD side looks better. If you look closely at the reflection from the light source on the Megs side, there's looks to be micro marring/hazing. It could be polishing oils that appear to be marring. Not sure. The HD side does not have that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Well I started a Titan at 8:14. I've done whole cars with speed before I wipe any off, so when I finish this truck and if it wipes off with no issues I might be more inclined to go the Meg's route
09bf40b3e9d43e927c06899c3b2a6bdc.jpg


Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
 
WRAPT C5Z06 said:
Nice comparo, thanks. The HD side looks better. If you look closely at the reflection from the light source on the Megs side, there's looks to be micro marring/hazing. It could be polishing oils that appear to be marring. Not sure. The HD side does not have that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I think I know what u are referring to and if it's what I think it is, it's the sanding marks from when it was repainted, but maybe u are seeing something I didn't notice

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top