psnt1ol
New member
- Aug 8, 2012
- 892
- 0
- Thread starter
- #21
Honestly, I am quite certain that I could have achieved the same results with the 21. Finishing is going to be very dependent upon residue control, machine speed, pad used, arm speed and pressure.
What speed were you using on the 21, and with what arm speed? How long did you work it for? Did you blow out the pad after a few passes?
For most people, the 3401 will "seem" to have better power, but the 21 is every bit (and actually more) powerful.
The learning curve is steep with the 21. Most beginner to intermediate users who reach for the 3401 will probably get better results at first. But if you take the time to understand how to fully utilize the capabilities of the 21, you will find it to be a very versatile tool.
By no means I am saying the Rupes is under-powered. I find I could do in one step with the Rupes that normally would take multiple steps with other machines (ie, Rotary then follow by a DA). But then....the same could be said for the Flex.
The polishing experience is where the Rupes wins out. I don't feel as beat up after putting a full day in with the Rupes than the Flex. This is why the Flex has been side lined in my case.
I was on speed 4.5 doing about 1.5 inch per sec. Did 7 section passes with a working area about 1.5 sq ft. I was using the Rupes white finishing pad. I had about 8-10 lbs of downward pressure on the first few passes and only the weight of the machine on the last 2. I also tried a higher speed with only the weight of the machine for 5 section passes. I then swap the Rupes pad with a black hybrid finishing pad and tried for the third and last time. For some strange reasons... a slight DA hazing occurs on all three test panels. I came to the conclusion that it might be the surface i was working on didn't like the action of the Rupes. Feed back please