Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tuan, who is a friend of mine, showed me a used blue Rupes pad. It was noticeably disintegrated. It felt very uneven. Not sure about the durability of this pad .Here's some dedicated pictures of the blue foam cutting pad to try to give you and idea of what they look like and then take my word for it, when you feel them they are very coarse or aggressive feeling.
I was very surprised at how well they worked with the Rupes compound to remove defects quickly while still finishing out very nice.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:xyxthumbs:
Thanks Mike for the pictures of this RUPES buffing-pad...
I think the main difference between PSI and PSIG is that PSI is not specific to the point of connection for the tool and could mean compressed air pressure at the tank and not the actual gauge and thus the air line feeding your tool. That means there can be differences in PSI by the time it gets to your tool depending upon the shop you work in and how many lines are being fed by the air tank/compressor.
Tuan, who is a friend of mine, showed me a used blue Rupes pad. It was noticeably disintegrated. It felt very uneven. Not sure about the durability of this pad .
Sorry if I sidetracked this, so back to the topic, if your compressed air piping/hosing isn't capable of delivering the volume your air tool needs, you will experience a high pressure drop between the tank and tool. If your compressor can't keep up with the demand, you will experience that drop in your receiver (air tank) as well, but these pressure drops would be the same no matter if you describe your pressure in PSIA or PSIG.
Always seems like the "online detailing crowd" is on the AR side...
Make sense?
Not sure what difference that makes? This guy is a seasoned detailer. He used it a few times and it looked pretty beat up. I had the pad in my hand.So you've never used one personally?
:dunno:
Not sure what difference that makes?
This guy is a seasoned detailer. He used it a few times and it looked pretty beat up. I had the pad in my hand.
The Rupes blue pad disintegrates worse than the HT Cyan pad.
An online personality that I respect once said "words mean things" so since I am very familiar with these terms I thought I would clarify the meaning.
It wasn't my intent to nitpick; I'm sorry if it came across that way![]()
I still stand by what I said. I think it will prove true in the future from other users, but, I also understand where you're coming from as well. :dblthumb2:Just some suggestions Mark...
:xyxthumbs:
I still stand by what I said. I think it will prove true in the future from other users, but, I also understand where you're coming from as well. :dblthumb2:
Hi Mike, great review of the rupes.. enjoy all the detailed info. I do have one question. I'm torn between the Rupes 21 and the flex 3401. If you had to use machine what would you grab and why?
Speed settings i've had great results with.
Blue Pad with Zephir on 5/6
Green Pad with Zephir on 4.5/6
Green Pad Quarz on 5/6
Yellow Pad with Quarz on 4 to 4.5/6
Yellow pad with Keramik on 4.5 to 5/6
White pad with keramik, all over the chart form 3 to 5/6
White pad with diamond, again all over from 3 to 5/6
Thanks in advance
Jonathan
Hi Eric,
Great question! And your first post!
I've never been on record stating there is such a thing as a single best tool. Not once.
Here's a question for you....
What kind of detailing work do you do right now?
A. Production Detailing - One and two-step procedures for a lower price point on primarily daily drivers.
B. Show Car Detailing - Multiple Step Procedures for a higher charge to the customer with primarily special interest cars.
Or, if you don't currently detail cars but are getting into this craft, what's your background experience and what type of market do you want to go after?
:xyxthumbs: